Literature DB >> 22999831

Knowledge and likelihood to recommend intrauterine devices for adolescents among school-based health center providers.

Julia E Kohn1, Jordan G Hacker, Marissa A Rousselle, Marji Gold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend intrauterine devices (IUDs) as safe and highly effective contraceptives for adolescents. Nevertheless, many U.S. providers do not recommend or provide IUDs to adolescents-a population at high risk for unintended pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to IUD provision for adolescents.
METHODS: A 36-item self-administered survey of knowledge and attitudes regarding IUDs was completed by 162 staff of New York City school-based health centers, including 69 clinicians (e.g., pediatricians and nurse practitioners) and 93 nonclinicians (e.g., social workers and health educators).
RESULTS: Half (55%) of all respondents would be likely to recommend an IUD to a patient under age 20 years. Respondents were less likely to recommend an IUD for patients with history of recent STD (31%), remote pelvic inflammatory disease (37%), and patients not in a monogamous relationship (38%). Whereas 77% of respondents indicated that IUDs are safe for adolescents, 18% of those respondents would be unlikely to recommend an IUD to a patient under age 20 years. While 86% of respondents knew that IUDs can be used in nulliparous women, 25% of those respondents would be unlikely to recommend an IUD to a patient who has never been pregnant. Additionally, 61% believed that counseling patients about IUDs would take more time than other methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Misinformation about risks associated with IUDs and beliefs about patient eligibility may present barriers to provision. Apparent contradictions between knowledge and likelihood to recommend IUDs warrant further study.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22999831     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  12 in total

1.  Motivations for Interest, Disinterest and Uncertainty in Intrauterine Device Use Among Young Women.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Bridget Freihart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

2.  Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Knowledge is necessary but insufficient to change provider attitudes about intrauterine devices for adolescents.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Health Care Provider Attitudes about the Safety of "Quick Start" Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.

Authors:  Isabel A Morgan; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  C Emily Hendrick; Joshua N Cone; Jessica Cirullo; Julie Maslowsky
Journal:  Adolesc Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-12

6.  Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Eve Waltermaurer; Natasha Miller; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

7.  Interdependent Barriers to Providing Adolescents with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Qualitative Insights from Providers.

Authors:  Molly K Murphy; Cindy Stoffel; Meghan Nolan; Sadia Haider
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 8.  Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew G Corley; Andrea Sprockett; Dominic Montagu; Nirali M Chakraborty
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 9.  Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review.

Authors:  Marina A S Daniele; John Cleland; Lenka Benova; Moazzam Ali
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Lack of Association between Cu T-380A Intrauterine Device and Secondary Infertility in Iran.

Authors:  Mahnaz Abdinasab; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Tahmineh Farajkhoda; Ali Mohammad Abdoli
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.