Literature DB >> 22998479

Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins.

Pirkko Ylisiurua1, Markku Koskela, Olli Vainio, Hanna Tuokko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile (CD) is considered an important cause of diarrhoea associated with the antimicrobial treatment of infections. The pathogenicity of CD is due to toxins A and B, produced by toxigenic CD strains.
METHODS: We evaluated 3 methods for detecting CD toxins: the RIDASCREEN® enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (R-Biopharm)--one detecting toxins directly in the stool specimens and another detecting toxins from isolated CD strains--and 2 molecular methods, the illumigene™ loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay (Meridian) and RIDA®GENE polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (R-Biopharm), as direct identification methods from stool specimens. Toxigenic culture (TC) was used as the reference method.
RESULTS: Altogether 884 stool samples were analyzed, of which 253 (29%) were positive by TC. Six hundred and seventy-two specimens were tested by RIDASCREEN EIA, 430 were tested with the illumigene LAMP assay, and 212 were tested with the RIDA GENE PCR assay. CD toxin A and B antigen tests by EIA were very insensitive, both directly from stool specimens (2 series; 57-61%) and in isolated CD strains (53%); consequently the negative predictive value remained low (84-93% and 91%, respectively). Specificity, however, was very good at 98-100%. The 2 molecular methods detected CD toxin genes excellently and equally, resulting in sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of 98%, 100%, 100%, and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both molecular assays were easy to use, rapid, sensitive, and specific for the detection of toxigenic CD strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22998479     DOI: 10.3109/00365548.2012.708780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0036-5548


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.

Authors:  Jari J Hirvonen; Silja Mentula; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Evaluation of the Qiagen artus C. difficile QS-RGQ Kit for Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins A and B in Clinical Stool Specimens.

Authors:  Nathalie Jazmati; Pia Wiegel; Božica Ličanin; Georg Plum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Variations in virulence and molecular biology among emerging strains of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Jonathan J Hunt; Jimmy D Ballard
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Martina Neuendorf; Raquel Guadarrama-Gonzalez; Birgit Lamik; Colin R MacKenzie
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 6.  Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Adrián Martínez-Meléndez; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza; Licet Villarreal-Treviño; Elvira Garza-González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Wei; Liu Wen-En; Li Yang-Ming; Luo Shan; Zhong Yi-Ming
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: An official clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy (SEQ), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the working group of Postoperative Infection of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Reanimation (SEDAR).

Authors:  E Bouza; J M Aguado; L Alcalá; B Almirante; P Alonso-Fernández; M Borges; J Cobo; J Guardiola; J P Horcajada; E Maseda; J Mensa; N Merchante; P Muñoz; J L Pérez Sáenz; M Pujol; E Reigadas; M Salavert; J Barberán
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.553

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.