BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of cervical nodal metastases is important for the prognosis and treatment of head and neck tumors. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of ADC values at 3T to distinguish malignant from benign lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2009 to June 2010, twenty-two patients (21 men and 1 woman; mean age, 49.8±9.5 years; age range, 28-66 years) scheduled for surgical treatment of biopsy-proved head and neck cancer were prospectively and consecutively enrolled in this study. All patients were scanned on a 3T imaging unit (Verio) by using a 12-channel head coil combined with a 4-channel neck coil. Histologic findings were the reference standard for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: The ADC values derived from the signal intensity averaged across images obtained with b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2 were 1.086±0.222×10(-3) mm2/s for benign lymph nodes and 0.705±0.118×10(-3) mm2/s for malignant lymph nodes (P<.0001). When an ADC value of 0.851×10(-3) mm2/s was used as a threshold value for differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes, the best results were obtained with an accuracy of 91.0%, sensitivity of 91.3%, and specificity of 91.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The ADC value is a sensitive and specific parameter that can help to differentiate malignant from benign lymph nodes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of cervical nodal metastases is important for the prognosis and treatment of head and neck tumors. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of ADC values at 3T to distinguish malignant from benign lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2009 to June 2010, twenty-two patients (21 men and 1 woman; mean age, 49.8±9.5 years; age range, 28-66 years) scheduled for surgical treatment of biopsy-proved head and neck cancer were prospectively and consecutively enrolled in this study. All patients were scanned on a 3T imaging unit (Verio) by using a 12-channel head coil combined with a 4-channel neck coil. Histologic findings were the reference standard for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: The ADC values derived from the signal intensity averaged across images obtained with b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2 were 1.086±0.222×10(-3) mm2/s for benign lymph nodes and 0.705±0.118×10(-3) mm2/s for malignant lymph nodes (P<.0001). When an ADC value of 0.851×10(-3) mm2/s was used as a threshold value for differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes, the best results were obtained with an accuracy of 91.0%, sensitivity of 91.3%, and specificity of 91.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The ADC value is a sensitive and specific parameter that can help to differentiate malignant from benign lymph nodes.
Authors: F Crippa; M Leutner; F Belli; F Gallino; M Greco; S Pilotti; N Cascinelli; E Bombardieri Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ann D King; Anil T Ahuja; David K W Yeung; Devin K Y Fong; Yolanda Y P Lee; Kenny I K Lei; Gary M K Tse Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Reza Assadsangabi; Rosa Babaei; Catherine Songco; Vladimir Ivanovic; Matthew Bobinski; Yin J Chen; Seyed Ali Nabavizadeh Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2021-05-16 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Marcelo A Queiroz; Martin Hüllner; Felix Kuhn; Gerhardt Huber; Christian Meerwein; Spyros Kollias; Gustav von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 9.236