Literature DB >> 22996261

Evidence for substrate-dependent inhibition profiles for human liver aldehyde oxidase.

John T Barr1, Jeffrey P Jones.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to provide a reasonable assessment of how probe substrate selection may impact the results of in vitro aldehyde oxidase (AO) inhibition experiments. Here, we used a previously studied set of seven known AO inhibitors to probe the inhibition profile of a pharmacologically relevant substrate N-[(2-dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide (DACA). DACA oxidation in human liver cytosol was characterized with a measured V(max) of 2.3 ± 0.08 nmol product · min(-1) · mg(-1) and a K(m) of 6.3 ± 0.8 µM. The K(ii) and K(is) values describing the inhibition of DACA oxidation by the panel of seven inhibitors were tabulated and compared with previous findings with phthalazine as the substrate. In every case, the inhibition profile shifted to a much less uncompetitive mode of inhibition for DACA relative to phthalazine. With the exception of one inhibitor, raloxifene, this change in inhibition profile seems to be a result of a decrease in the uncompetitive mode of inhibition (an affected K(ii) value), whereas the competitive mode (K(is)) seems to be relatively consistent between substrates. Raloxifene was found to inhibit competitively when using DACA as a probe, and a previous report showed that raloxifene inhibited uncompetitively with other substrates. The relevance of these data to the mechanistic understanding of aldehyde oxidase inhibition and potential implications on drug-drug interactions is discussed. Overall, it appears that the choice in substrate may be critical when conducting mechanistic inhibition or in vitro drug-drug interactions prediction studies with AO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22996261      PMCID: PMC3533431          DOI: 10.1124/dmd.112.048546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  17 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing drug development: strategies to assess drug metabolism/transporter interaction potential--toward a consensus.

Authors:  G T Tucker; J B Houston; S M Huang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  The utility of in vitro cytochrome P450 inhibition data in the prediction of drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  R Scott Obach; Robert L Walsky; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Emily A Gaman; J Brian Houston; Larry M Tremaine
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Metabolism of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide in cancer patients undergoing a phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  P C Schofield; I G Robertson; J W Paxton; M R McCrystal; B D Evans; P Kestell; B C Baguley
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics of raloxifene and its clinical application.

Authors:  D Hochner-Celnikier
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 5.  Drug-metabolizing ability of molybdenum hydroxylases.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kitamura; Kazumi Sugihara; Shigeru Ohta
Journal:  Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.614

6.  Use of density functional calculations to predict the regioselectivity of drugs and molecules metabolized by aldehyde oxidase.

Authors:  Rhonda A Torres; Kenneth R Korzekwa; Daniel R McMasters; Christine M Fandozzi; Jeffrey P Jones
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 7.  Human liver aldehyde oxidase: inhibition by 239 drugs.

Authors:  R Scott Obach; Phuong Huynh; Mary C Allen; Christine Beedham
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Contribution of aldehyde oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and aldehyde dehydrogenase on the oxidation of aromatic aldehydes.

Authors:  Georgios I Panoutsopoulos; Demetrios Kouretas; Christine Beedham
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Potential antitumor agents. 50. In vivo solid-tumor activity of derivatives of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide.

Authors:  G J Atwell; G W Rewcastle; B C Baguley; W A Denny
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Potent inhibition of human liver aldehyde oxidase by raloxifene.

Authors:  R Scott Obach
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.922

View more
  17 in total

1.  Absolute quantification of aldehyde oxidase protein in human liver using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  John T Barr; Jeffrey P Jones; Carolyn A Joswig-Jones; Dan A Rock
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Inhibition of xanthine oxidase by the aldehyde oxidase inhibitor raloxifene: implications for identifying molybdopterin nitrite reductases.

Authors:  E R Weidert; S O Schoenborn; N Cantu-Medellin; K V Choughule; J P Jones; E E Kelley
Journal:  Nitric Oxide       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.427

3.  A novel reaction mediated by human aldehyde oxidase: amide hydrolysis of GDC-0834.

Authors:  Jasleen K Sodhi; Susan Wong; Donald S Kirkpatrick; Lichuan Liu; S Cyrus Khojasteh; Cornelis E C A Hop; John T Barr; Jeffrey P Jones; Jason S Halladay
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  Interspecies differences in the metabolism of methotrexate: An insight into the active site differences between human and rabbit aldehyde oxidase.

Authors:  Kanika V Choughule; Carolyn A Joswig-Jones; Jeffrey P Jones
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Computationally Assessing the Bioactivation of Drugs by N-Dealkylation.

Authors:  Na Le Dang; Tyler B Hughes; Grover P Miller; S Joshua Swamidass
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Time Course of Aldehyde Oxidase and Why It Is Nonlinear.

Authors:  Armina Abbasi; Erickson M Paragas; Carolyn A Joswig-Jones; John T Rodgers; Jeffrey P Jones
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.922

7.  Why do most human liver cytosol preparations lack xanthine oxidase activity?

Authors:  John T Barr; Kanika V Choughule; Sahadev Nepal; Timothy Wong; Amarjit S Chaudhry; Carolyn A Joswig-Jones; Michael Zientek; Stephen C Strom; Erin G Schuetz; Kenneth E Thummel; Jeffrey P Jones
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Evaluation of rhesus monkey and guinea pig hepatic cytosol fractions as models for human aldehyde oxidase.

Authors:  Kanika V Choughule; John T Barr; Jeffrey P Jones
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  Site-Directed Mutagenesis at the Molybdenum Pterin Cofactor Site of the Human Aldehyde Oxidase: Interrogating the Kinetic Differences Between Human and Cynomolgus Monkey.

Authors:  Armina Abbasi; Carolyn A Joswig-Jones; Jeffrey P Jones
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  In vitro oxidative metabolism of 6-mercaptopurine in human liver: insights into the role of the molybdoflavoenzymes aldehyde oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and xanthine dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Kanika V Choughule; Carlo Barnaba; Carolyn A Joswig-Jones; Jeffrey P Jones
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.922

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.