Literature DB >> 22996105

Effect of radical cytoreductive surgery on omission and delay of chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Jason D Wright1, Thomas J Herzog, Alfred I Neugut, William M Burke, Yu-Shiang Lu, Sharyn N Lewin, Dawn L Hershman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cytoreductive surgery is associated with extensive morbidity and may delay chemotherapy. We examined the associations among cytoreduction, perioperative complications, and delay or omission of chemotherapy.
METHODS: Women aged 65 years or older with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who were treated with surgery from 1991-2005 and recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database were examined. We estimated the influence of extended cytoreduction as well as the occurrence of major perioperative complications on receipt and timing of chemotherapy and survival.
RESULTS: Among 3,991 patients, 479 (12%) failed to receive chemotherapy. Of those treated with chemotherapy, 2,527 (72%) initiated treatment within 6 weeks of surgery, 838 (24%) within 6-12 weeks, and 147 (4%) more than 12 weeks after surgery. In a multivariable model, older patients, those with comorbidities, mucinous tumors, and stage IV neoplasms were more likely not to receive chemotherapy (P<.05). Extended cytoreduction and the occurrence of postoperative complications were not associated with omission of chemotherapy but were associated with chemotherapy delay. For every 14 patients who underwent one extended procedure and for every 13 who had two extended procedures, one patient had a delay in receipt of chemotherapy. For every 14 patients who had one complication and for every four who had two complications, one patient had a delay in receipt of chemotherapy. The occurrence of more than two perioperative complications (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.49) and initiation of chemotherapy more than 12 weeks after surgery (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.64) were associated with decreased survival.
CONCLUSION: Extended cytoreductive surgery and perioperative complications significantly delay initiation but do not increase the chance of omission of chemotherapy for women with ovarian cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22996105     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826981de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  31 in total

1.  National Trends in Extended Procedures for Ovarian Cancer Debulking Surgery.

Authors:  Nathaniel L Jones; Ling Chen; Sudeshna Chatterjee; Ana I Tergas; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Risk stratification and outcomes of women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Early initiation of chemotherapy following complete resection of advanced ovarian cancer associated with improved survival: NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  K S Tewari; J J Java; R N Eskander; B J Monk; R A Burger
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Comparative effectiveness of upfront treatment strategies in elderly women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Jennifer Tsui; Sherry A Glied; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A preoperative personalized risk assessment calculator for elderly ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Sarah Rutstein; William C Miller; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Variation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization for epithelial ovarian cancer at high volume hospitals in the United States and associated survival.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Stacie B Dusetzina; Karyn B Stitzenberg; Emma C Rossi; Paola A Gehrig; John F Boggess; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Development and validation of a risk-calculator for adverse perioperative outcomes for women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie Cham; Ling Chen; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Alexander Melamed; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Pre-operative assessment and post-operative outcomes of elderly women with gynecologic cancers, primary analysis of NRG CC-002: An NRG oncology group/gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Amina Ahmed; Wei Deng; William Tew; David Bender; Robert S Mannel; Ramey D Littell; Albert S DeNittis; Mitchell Edelson; Mark Morgan; Jay Carlson; Christopher J Darus; Aimee C Fleury; Susan Modesitt; Alexander Olawaiye; Anthony Evans; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Emma L Barber; Anagha Gogate; Arthur-Quan Tran; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 10.  Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Anna E Austin; Ryan P Hickson; Matthew S Dixon; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.