BACKGROUND: Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) perform poorly on the Stroop task, which is a measure of the executive control of attention, with impaired interference resolution. The neural correlates of this deficit are not well described. To examine how this deficit relates to pathophysiological abnormalities in MDD, we conducted an fMRI Stroop study comparing MDD subjects to controls. METHODS: Forty-two unmedicated patients with current MDD and 17 control subjects underwent fMRI scanning with a color-word Stroop task. Subjects assessed font color during alternating color identification (e.g., 'XXXX' in blue) and incongruent color/word blocks (e.g., the word 'red' in blue). We examined neural activation that was greater in incongruent than color identification blocks (Z>2.3 and corrected p<0.05), controlling for trial-by-trial reaction time. RESULTS: Compared to controls, MDD subjects exhibited lower activation during incongruent blocks across multiple brain regions, including middle frontal gyrus, paracingulate and posterior cingulate, precuneus, occipital regions, and brain stem. No brain regions were identified in which MDD subjects were more active than controls during incongruent blocks. LIMITATIONS: Not all MDD subjects were antidepressant-naïve. CONCLUSIONS: Brain regions related to executive function, visual processing, and semantic processing are less active during processing of incongruent stimuli in MDD subjects as compared to controls. Deficits of attention in MDD may be the product of a failure to maintain activity across a distributed network in a sustained manner, as is required over the sequential trials in this block design. Further studies may clarify whether the abnormalities represent a trait or state deficit.
BACKGROUND:Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) perform poorly on the Stroop task, which is a measure of the executive control of attention, with impaired interference resolution. The neural correlates of this deficit are not well described. To examine how this deficit relates to pathophysiological abnormalities in MDD, we conducted an fMRI Stroop study comparing MDD subjects to controls. METHODS: Forty-two unmedicated patients with current MDD and 17 control subjects underwent fMRI scanning with a color-word Stroop task. Subjects assessed font color during alternating color identification (e.g., 'XXXX' in blue) and incongruent color/word blocks (e.g., the word 'red' in blue). We examined neural activation that was greater in incongruent than color identification blocks (Z>2.3 and corrected p<0.05), controlling for trial-by-trial reaction time. RESULTS: Compared to controls, MDD subjects exhibited lower activation during incongruent blocks across multiple brain regions, including middle frontal gyrus, paracingulate and posterior cingulate, precuneus, occipital regions, and brain stem. No brain regions were identified in which MDD subjects were more active than controls during incongruent blocks. LIMITATIONS: Not all MDD subjects were antidepressant-naïve. CONCLUSIONS: Brain regions related to executive function, visual processing, and semantic processing are less active during processing of incongruent stimuli in MDD subjects as compared to controls. Deficits of attention in MDD may be the product of a failure to maintain activity across a distributed network in a sustained manner, as is required over the sequential trials in this block design. Further studies may clarify whether the abnormalities represent a trait or state deficit.
Authors: Bradley S Peterson; Michael J Kane; Gerianne M Alexander; Cheryl Lacadie; Pawel Skudlarski; Hoi Chung Leung; James May; John C Gore Journal: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res Date: 2002-05
Authors: Larissa A Mead; Andrew R Mayer; Julie A Bobholz; Scott J Woodley; Joseph M Cunningham; Thomas A Hammeke; Stephen M Rao Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Jeannette Legris; Paul S Links; Robert van Reekum; Rosemary Tannock; Maggie Toplak Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: James W Murrough; Brian Iacoviello; Alexander Neumeister; Dennis S Charney; Dan V Iosifescu Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Burkhard Maess; Angela D Friederici; Markus Damian; Antje S Meyer; Willem J M Levelt Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Mina M Rizk; Harry Rubin-Falcone; Xuejing Lin; John G Keilp; Jeffrey M Miller; Matthew S Milak; M Elizabeth Sublette; Maria A Oquendo; R Todd Ogden; Nashaat A Abdelfadeel; Mohamed A Abdelhameed; J John Mann Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Mina M Rizk; Harry Rubin-Falcone; John Keilp; Jeffrey M Miller; M Elizabeth Sublette; Ainsley Burke; Maria A Oquendo; Ahmed M Kamal; Mohamed A Abdelhameed; J John Mann Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: G S Alexopoulos; K Manning; D Kanellopoulos; A McGovern; J K Seirup; S Banerjee; F Gunning Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Michael Firbank; Xenia Kobeleva; George Cherry; Alison Killen; Peter Gallagher; David J Burn; Alan J Thomas; John T O'Brien; John-Paul Taylor Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-12-26 Impact factor: 5.038