Literature DB >> 12941282

Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: a historical footnote.

Colin M MacLeod1, Peter W Sheehan.   

Abstract

Raz, Shapiro, Fan, and Posner (2002) have recently provided a compelling demonstration of enhanced attentional control under post-hypnotic suggestion. Using the classic color-word interference paradigm, in which the task is to ignore a word and to name the color in which it is printed (e.g., RED in green, say "green"), they gave a post-hypnotic instruction to participants that they would be unable to read. This eliminated Stroop interference in high suggestibility participants but did not alter interference in low suggestibility participants. replicated this pattern and further demonstrated that it is not due to a visual strategy (such as blurring or looking at a different location). As a historical footnote, we describe a "case study" from 18 years ago in which we observed the same result using a hypnotic instruction to a single highly suggestible individual that he could not read. The elimination of Stroop interference has important implications for both the study of attention and the study of hypnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12941282     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00025-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  6 in total

1.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  The power of charisma--perceived charisma inhibits the frontal executive network of believers in intercessory prayer.

Authors:  Uffe Schjoedt; Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen; Armin W Geertz; Torben E Lund; Andreas Roepstorff
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Jin Fan; Michael I Posner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neural responses to incongruency in a blocked-trial Stroop fMRI task in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Toshiaki Kikuchi; Jeffrey M Miller; Noam Schneck; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey; John G Keilp
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  The impact of hypnotic suggestions on reaction times in continuous performance test in adults with ADHD and healthy controls.

Authors:  Maarit Virta; Seppo Hiltunen; Markus Mattsson; Sakari Kallio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Significant variation in salivation by short-term suggestive intervention: a randomized controlled cross-over clinical study.

Authors:  Maximilian Satzl; Albrecht Schmierer; Florian Zeman; Gottfried Schmalz; Thomas Loew
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.151

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.