Literature DB >> 22995746

Comparable clinical outcomes and live births after single vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer.

Guixue Feng1, Bo Zhang, Hong Zhou, Jinhui Shu, Xianyou Gan, Fangrong Wu, Xihe Deng.   

Abstract

Selective single-blastocyst transfer (SBT) in fresh cycles has been effective in reducing multiple pregnancies. However, we do not know whether this successful strategy of fresh transfer cycles is suitable for cryopreserved cycles. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility and value of SBT in vitrified-warmed cycles. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) was similar with vitrified and fresh SBT (46.61% versus 52.15% respectively). Of the pregnant patients, monozygotic twin, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates were similar with vitrified and fresh SBT. For the newborns, no significant difference was observed in live birth, low birthweight, premature delivery and birth defects rates between vitrified and fresh SBT. With respect to the quality of transferred blastocysts (from BB to AA), a similar CPR and miscarriage rate was obtained for both vitrified and fresh SBT when a similar blastocyst cohort graded ≥ 3BB was transferred. The data show that vitrified SBT is an effective means of reducing multiple pregnancy and that comparable clinical outcomes and live births are achieved if single blastocysts graded ≥ 3BB are transferred for both vitrified and fresh SBT. These data should encourage clinics to evaluate their embryo transfer policy and adopt vitrified SBT as everyday practice. Selective single-blastocyst transfer in fresh cycles has been an effective method to reduce the multiple pregnancies. However, due to a lack of adequate studies, we do not know whether this successful strategy in fresh transfer cycles is suitable in cryopreserved cycles. The present study was undertaken to explore the feasibility and value of single-blastocyst transfer in vitrified-warmed cycles. We found that single-blastocyst transfer in vitrified-warmed cycles is an effective means of reducing multiple pregnancy, and comparable clinical outcomes and live births were achieved if single blastocysts graded ≥ 3BB were transferred for both vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer. These data should encourage clinics to evaluate their embryo transfer policy and adopt single-blastocyst transfer in cryopreserved cycles as their everyday practice.
Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22995746     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  MeiFang Zeng; SuQin Su; LiuMing Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Frozen embryo transfer can be performed in the cycle immediately following the freeze-all cycle.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Embryo stage of development is not decisive for reproductive outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Bruno R de Carvalho; Marina W Paes Barbosa; Helena Bonesi; David B Gomes; Íris O Cabral; Antônio C Paes Barbosa; Adelino A Silva; José R Iglesias; Hitomi M Nakagawa
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Are commercial warming kits interchangeable for vitrified human blastocysts? Further evidence for the adoption of a Universal Warming protocol.

Authors:  Stefano Canosa; Lodovico Parmegiani; Lorena Charrier; Gianluca Gennarelli; Cristina Garello; Francesca Granella; Francesca Evangelista; Giuseppe Monelli; Daniela Guidetti; Alberto Revelli; Marco Filicori; Francesca Bongioanni
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Higher clinical pregnancy rates from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers compared to fresh blastocyst transfers: a retrospective matched-cohort study.

Authors:  Kemal Özgür; Murat Berkkanoğlu; Hasan Bulut; Ayhan Isikli; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Clinical and perinatal outcomes of fresh single-blastocyst-transfer cycles under an early follicular phase prolonged protocol according to day of trigger estradiol levels.

Authors:  Yingfen Ying; Xiaosheng Lu; Huina Zhang; Samuel Kofi Arhin; Xiaohong Hou; Zefan Wang; Han Wu; Jieqiang Lu; Yunbing Tang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  The effect of extended cryo-storage following vitrification on embryo competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Canosa; D Cimadomo; A Conforti; R Maggiulli; A Giancani; A Tallarita; F Golia; G Fabozzi; A Vaiarelli; G Gennarelli; A Revelli; F Bongioanni; C Alviggi; F M Ubaldi; L Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Effect of different artificial shrinkage methods, when applied before blastocyst vitrification, on perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Caizhu Wang; Guixue Feng; Bo Zhang; Hong Zhou; Jinhui Shu; Ruoyun Lin; Huanhua Chen; Zhulian Wu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  A successful pregnancy using completely immotile but viable frozen-thawed spermatozoa selected by laser.

Authors:  Huanhua Chen; Guixue Feng; Bo Zhang; Hong Zhou; Jinhui Shu; Xianyou Gan
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-03-31

10.  A freeze-all strategy does not increase live birth rates in women of advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  K Lattes; S López; M A Checa; M Brassesco; D García; R Vassena
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.