Literature DB >> 22994470

Teaching skills for students: our future educators.

Annette Burgess1, Kirsten Black, Renata Chapman, Tyler Clark, Chris Roberts, Craig Mellis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The future of medical education is under increasing strain from a paucity of clinical educators with formal teaching experience and time to fulfil their teaching roles. 'Teaching on the Run' (TOR), is a programme aimed at improving the quality of teaching by medical educators. We hypothesised that the completion of the TOR programme by senior medical students would increase student awareness of quality educational practice, thereby improving their competence and confidence in teaching and assessing their peers.
METHODS: Seventeen senior medical students who participated in the TOR programme completed before and after questionnaires based on the key outcomes of the programme. All students were invited to participate in a focus group session to explore their attitudes and experiences of having completed the programme. Seven students chose to participate.
RESULTS: The TOR increased students' perceived ability to apply educational principles, plan learning activities and to provide feedback. During the focus group session students expressed an appreciation that the medical school was genuinely interested in improving the quality of their teaching and learning. However, the programme did not improve students' confidence in assessing their peers. DISCUSSION: We found that the TOR programme may provide a foundation from which future medical educators may be trained. In particular, these students seem to have developed some understanding of the principles of adult learning, and may be better prepared to plan and deliver a teaching session. This augurs well for the future of medical education, which depends on the emergence of a new generation of trained medical educators. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22994470     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00554.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Teach        ISSN: 1743-4971


  12 in total

1.  Teacher training program for medical students: improvements needed.

Authors:  Christie van Diggele; Annette Burgess; Craig Mellis
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Facilitating the development of professional identity through peer assisted learning in medical education.

Authors:  Annette Burgess; Debra Nestel
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-10-30

3.  Importance of incorporating teaching of feedback skills into medical curricula.

Authors:  Silvia Allikmets; Jasper Vink
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-04-22

4.  A survey of senior medical students' attitudes and awareness toward teaching and participation in a formal clinical teaching elective: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  J D Matthew Hughes; Elise Azzi; Gregory Walter Rose; Christopher J Ramnanan; Karima Khamisa
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

5.  Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs.

Authors:  Annette Burgess; Deborah McGregor
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  Feedback and assessment for clinical placements: achieving the right balance.

Authors:  Annette Burgess; Craig Mellis
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-05-19

7.  Senior students' experience as tutors of their junior peers in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Antonia J Clarke; Annette Burgess; Audrey Menezes; Craig Mellis
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-12-02

8.  Multisource feedback analysis of pediatric outpatient teaching.

Authors:  Mao-Meng Tiao; Li-Tung Huang; Ying-Hsien Huang; Kuo-Shu Tang; Chih-Jen Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Annette Burgess; Deborah McGregor; Craig Mellis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Peers as OSCE assessors for junior medical students - a review of routine use: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Simon Schwill; Johanna Fahrbach-Veeser; Andreas Moeltner; Christiane Eicher; Sonia Kurczyk; David Pfisterer; Joachim Szecsenyi; Svetla Loukanova
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.