Literature DB >> 2299041

Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive sound events.

D J Freed1.   

Abstract

A psychophysical investigation of timbre was undertaken with the intent of deriving quantitative results that could be useful in musical applications. Recordings of metal objects being struck with percussion mallets were rated by subjects on a unidimensional perceptual scale of perceived mallet hardness. Four acoustical parameters of the attack portion (first 325 ms) were defined and evaluated as predictors of perceived mallet hardness rating. To measure these parameters, a critical-band filter bank was employed. Two curves were extracted from the filter-bank output: (1) spectral level (log of area under spectrum) over time, and (2) spectral centroid over time. For each curve, two parameters were measured: the mean and the slope of the spectral level curve, and the mean and the time-weighted average of the spectral centroid curve. Multiple regression analysis was used to relate the perceptual ratings to these four acoustical parameters, and a good fit was achieved (multiple R-squared = 0.725, F = 1135.8, p less than 0.01). The resulting function is suitable for quantitatively predicting the perceptual dimension of perceived mallet hardness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2299041     DOI: 10.1121/1.399298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vowel constrictions are recoverable from formants.

Authors:  Khalil Iskarous
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-07-01

3.  Sensory constraints on auditory identification of the material and geometric properties of struck bars.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory discrimination of force of impact.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Chimpanzees use tree species with a resonant timbre for accumulative stone throwing.

Authors:  Ammie K Kalan; Eleonora Carmignani; Richard Kronland-Martinet; Sølvi Ystad; Jacques Chatron; Mitsuko Aramaki
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The incongruency advantage for environmental sounds presented in natural auditory scenes.

Authors:  Brian Gygi; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Shake, Rattle, and … One or Two Objects? Young Infants' Use of Auditory Information to Individuate Objects.

Authors:  Teresa Wilcox; Rebecca Woods; Lisa Tuggy; Roman Napoli
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2006-01-01

8.  Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Brian Gygi; Min-Yu Cheng; Jay Vachhani; Megan Mulvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Shape from sound: evidence for a shape operator in the lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Ryan A Stevenson; Sunah Kim; Ross M Vanderklok; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Lustrous material appearances: Internal and external constraints on triggering conditions for binocular lustre.

Authors:  Rainer Mausfeld; Gunnar Wendt; Jürgen Golz
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.