Literature DB >> 20871808

Vowel constrictions are recoverable from formants.

Khalil Iskarous1.   

Abstract

The area function of the vocal tract in all of its spatial detail is not directly computable from the speech signal. But is partial, yet phonetically distinctive, information about articulation recoverable from the acoustic signal that arrives at the listener's ear? The answer to this question is important for phonetics, because various theories of speech perception predict different answers. Some theories assume that recovery of articulatory information must be possible, while others assume that it is impossible. However, neither type of theory provides firm evidence showing that distinctive articulatory information is or is not extractable from the acoustic signal. The present study focuses on vowel gestures and examines whether linguistically significant information, such as the constriction location, constriction degree, and rounding, is contained in the speech signal, and whether such information is recoverable from formant parameters. Perturbation theory and linear prediction were combined, in a manner similar to that in Mokhtari (1998) [Mokhtari, P. (1998). An acoustic-phonetic and articulatory study of speech-speaker dichotomy. Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales], to assess the accuracy of recovery of information about vowel constrictions. Distinctive constriction information estimated from the speech signal for ten American English vowels were compared to the constriction information derived from simultaneously collected X-ray microbeam articulatory data for 39 speakers [Westbury (1994). Xray microbeam speech production database user's handbook. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI]. The recovery of distinctive articulatory information relies on a novel technique that uses formant frequencies and amplitudes, and does not depend on a principal components analysis of the articulatory data, as do most other inversion techniques. These results provide evidence that distinctive articulatory information for vowels can be recovered from the acoustic signal.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20871808      PMCID: PMC2944035          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  22 in total

1.  Hearing shape.

Authors:  A J Kunkler-Peck; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted bars.

Authors:  Stephen McAdams; Antoine Chaigne; Vincent Roussarie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck-clamped bar.

Authors:  R A Lutfi; E L Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech analysis and synthesis by linear prediction of the speech wave.

Authors:  B S Atal; S L Hanaver
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Determination of sagittal tongue shape from the positions of points on the tongue surface.

Authors:  T Kaburagi; M Honda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Inversion of articulatory-to-acoustic transformation in the vocal tract by a computer-sorting technique.

Authors:  B S Atal; J J Chang; M V Mathews; J W Tukey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The relations between area functions and the acoustic signal.

Authors:  G Fant
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  Generating vocal tract shapes from formant frequencies.

Authors:  P Ladefoged; R Harshman; L Goldstein; L Rice
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Piecewise--planar representation of vowel formant frequencies.

Authors:  D J Broad; H Wakita
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hearing tongue loops: perceptual sensitivity to acoustic signatures of articulatory dynamics.

Authors:  Hosung Nam; Christine Mooshammer; Khalil Iskarous; D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Asymmetries in unimodal visual vowel perception: The roles of oral-facial kinematics, orientation, and configuration.

Authors:  Matthew Masapollo; Linda Polka; Lucie Ménard; Lauren Franklin; Mark Tiede; James Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Direct Perceptions of Carol Fowler's Theoretical Perspective.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Talking as doing: Language forms and public language.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics?

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; James S Magnuson; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  On Short-Time Estimation of Vocal Tract Length from Formant Frequencies.

Authors:  Adam C Lammert; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A magnetic resonance imaging study on the articulatory and acoustic speech parameters of Malay vowels.

Authors:  Alireza Zourmand; Seyed Mostafa Mirhassani; Hua-Nong Ting; Shaik Ismail Bux; Kwan Hoong Ng; Mehmet Bilgen; Mohd Amin Jalaludin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  The FACTS model of speech motor control: Fusing state estimation and task-based control.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Vikram Ramanarayanan; Srikantan Nagarajan; John Houde
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.