Literature DB >> 22990228

The effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking behavior: evidence from the Canadian experience.

Sunday Azagba1, Mesbah F Sharaf.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a substantial literature that graphic tobacco warnings are effective; however, there is limited evidence based on actual smoking behavior. The objective of this paper is to assess the effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking prevalence and quit attempts.
METHODS: A nationally representative sample of individuals aged 15 years and older from the Canadian National Population Health Survey 1998-2008 is used. The sample consists of 4,853 individuals for the smoking prevalence regression and 1,549 smokers for quit attempts. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to examine the population-averaged (marginal) effects of tobacco graphic warnings on smoking prevalence and quit attempts. To assess the effect of graphic tobacco health warnings on smoking behavior, we used a scaled variable that takes the value of 0 for the first 6 months in 2001, then increases gradually to 1 from December 2001.
RESULTS: We found that graphic warnings had a statistically significant effect on smoking prevalence and quit attempts. In particular, the warnings decreased the odds of being a smoker (odds ratio [OR] = 0.875; 95% CI = 0.821-0.932) and increased the odds of making a quit attempt (OR = 1.330, CI = 1.187-1.490). Similar results were obtained when we allowed for more time for the warnings to appear in retail outlets.
CONCLUSION: This study adds to the growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of graphic warnings. Our findings suggest that warnings had a significant effect on smoking prevalence and quit attempts in Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22990228     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  59 in total

1.  Perceptions and perceived impact of graphic cigarette health warning labels on smoking behavior among U.S. young adults.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer Cantrell; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna M Vallone; Jessica M Rath
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Seth M Noar; Humberto Parada; Al Stein-Seroussi; Laura E Bach; Sean Hanley; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Testing warning messages on smokers' cigarette packages: a standardised protocol.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Joseph G L Lee; Kathryn Peebles; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Addiction Treatment Clients' Reactions to Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs.

Authors:  Anna Pagano; Noah Gubner; Barbara Tajima; Deborah Yip; Catherine Henderson; Joseph Guydish
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2017-03-20

Review 5.  Systematic review of the effect of pictorial warnings on cigarette packages in smoking behavior.

Authors:  Joel Monárrez-Espino; Bojing Liu; Felix Greiner; Sven Bremberg; Rosaria Galanti
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cost Effectiveness of Nutrition Policies on Processed Meat: Implications for Cancer Burden in the U.S.

Authors:  David D Kim; Parke E Wilde; Dominique S Michaud; Junxiu Liu; Lauren Lizewski; Jennifer Onopa; Dariush Mozaffarian; Fang Fang Zhang; John B Wong
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Reactions to FDA-Proposed Graphic Warning Labels Affixed to U.S. Smokers' Cigarette Packs.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Sonia Boyum; Vetta S Thompson; Charlene A Caburnay; Erika A Waters; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Suchitra Rath; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Emotional graphic cigarette warning labels reduce the electrophysiological brain response to smoking cues.

Authors:  An-Li Wang; Dan Romer; Igor Elman; Bruce I Turetsky; Ruben C Gur; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Estimating the Potential Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Adverse Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in the United States Using the SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Model.

Authors:  David Levy; Mary Katherine Mohlman; Yian Zhang
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Cigarette graphic warning labels and smoking prevalence in Canada: a critical examination and reformulation of the FDA regulatory impact analysis.

Authors:  Jidong Huang; Frank J Chaloupka; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.