STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the breath carbon monoxide (CO) concentration can be used to determine a patient's smoking habits in a respiratory outpatient clinic. DESIGN: To provide a normal range for smokers and nonsmokers, 41 outpatients and 24 healthy subjects were questioned on their smoking habits and asked to provide two breaths into a CO monitor (EC50 Smokerlyser; Bedfont Instruments; Kent, UK). In a subsequent single-blind study, 51 different outpatients were not told of the purpose of the study and were assessed by extensive questionnaire, spirometry, and Smokerlyser estimation. SETTING: The Chest Clinic and Pulmonary Medicine Department at the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1 involved 41 outpatients attending the Chest Clinic and 24 nonoutpatient colleagues. In phase 2, an additional 51 different outpatients were studied. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The mean (SD) breath CO levels were 17.4 (11.6) parts per million (ppm) for smokers and 1.8 (1.3) ppm for nonsmokers (p < 0.001). A level of 6 ppm was taken as the cutoff, as this gave a selectivity of 96% and a sensitivity of 94% for outpatients. Of the 51 study patients, 5 admitted to smoking in the administered questionnaire. Eight denied smoking but had a mean breath CO > 6 ppm (7.5 to 42 ppm). Of these, three admitted to smoking after being explained the implication of the reading. CONCLUSIONS: Breath CO concentration provides an easy, noninvasive, and immediate way of assessing a patient's smoking status. A reading > 6 ppm strongly suggests that an outpatient is a smoker.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the breath carbon monoxide (CO) concentration can be used to determine a patient's smoking habits in a respiratory outpatient clinic. DESIGN: To provide a normal range for smokers and nonsmokers, 41 outpatients and 24 healthy subjects were questioned on their smoking habits and asked to provide two breaths into a CO monitor (EC50 Smokerlyser; Bedfont Instruments; Kent, UK). In a subsequent single-blind study, 51 different outpatients were not told of the purpose of the study and were assessed by extensive questionnaire, spirometry, and Smokerlyser estimation. SETTING: The Chest Clinic and Pulmonary Medicine Department at the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1 involved 41 outpatients attending the Chest Clinic and 24 nonoutpatient colleagues. In phase 2, an additional 51 different outpatients were studied. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The mean (SD) breath CO levels were 17.4 (11.6) parts per million (ppm) for smokers and 1.8 (1.3) ppm for nonsmokers (p < 0.001). A level of 6 ppm was taken as the cutoff, as this gave a selectivity of 96% and a sensitivity of 94% for outpatients. Of the 51 study patients, 5 admitted to smoking in the administered questionnaire. Eight denied smoking but had a mean breath CO > 6 ppm (7.5 to 42 ppm). Of these, three admitted to smoking after being explained the implication of the reading. CONCLUSIONS: Breath CO concentration provides an easy, noninvasive, and immediate way of assessing a patient's smoking status. A reading > 6 ppm strongly suggests that an outpatient is a smoker.
Authors: Kate Goldade; Guy-Lucien Whembolua; Janet Thomas; Sara Eischen; Hongfei Guo; John Connett; Don Des Jarlais; Ken Resnicow; Lillian Gelberg; Greg Owen; Jon Grant; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Kolawole S Okuyemi Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Odette Engel Brügger; Marc Frei; Pedram Sendi; Peter A Reichart; Christoph A Ramseier; Michael M Bornstein Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-07-20 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Martin Wagner; Götz Gelbrich; Julia Kircher; Kornelia Kotseva; David Wood; Caroline Morbach; Rainer Leyh; Georg Ertl; Wolfgang Karmann; Stefan Störk; Peter U Heuschmann Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2018-06
Authors: Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang; Frank Telang; Joanna S Fowler; David Alexoff; Jean Logan; Millard Jayne; Christopher Wong; Dardo Tomasi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas F Northrup; Angela L Stotts; Robert Suchting; Amir M Khan; Charles Green; Michelle R Klawans; Penelope J E Quintana; Eunha Hoh; Melbourne F Hovell; Georg E Matt Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Nadia N Hansel; Meredith C McCormack; Andrew J Belli; Elizabeth C Matsui; Roger D Peng; Charles Aloe; Laura Paulin; D'Ann L Williams; Gregory B Diette; Patrick N Breysse Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 21.405