| Literature DB >> 22988513 |
Jing Li1, Srikant Viswanadha, Juan J Loor.
Abstract
Dietary trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (trans-10, cis-12-CLA) fed to obese and nonobese rodents reduces body fat but leads to greater liver mass due to steatosis. The molecular mechanisms accompanying such responses remain largely unknown. Our study investigated the effects of chronic low trans-10, cis-12-CLA supplementation on hepatic expression of 39 genes related to metabolism, inflammation, and stress in growing mice. Feeding a diet supplemented with 0.3% trans-10, cis-12-CLA (wt/wt basis) for 6 weeks increased liver mass and concentration of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) in liver, while adipose tissue mass decreased markedly. These changes were accompanied by greater expression of genes involved in LCFA uptake (Cd36), lipogenesis, and triacylglycerol synthesis (Acaca, Gpam, Scd, Pck1, Plin2). Expression of these genes was in line with upregulation of the lipogenic transcription factor Srebf1. Unlike previous studies where higher >0.50% of the diet) doses of trans-10, cis-12-CLA were fed, we found greater expression of genes associated with VLDL assembly/secretion (Mttp, Cideb), ketogenesis (Hmgcs2, Bdh1), and LCFA oxidation (Acox1, Pdk4) in response to trans-10, cis-12-CLA. Dietary CLA, however, did not affect inflammation- and stress-related genes. Results suggested that a chronic low dose of dietary CLA increases liver mass and lipid accumulation due to activation of lipogenesis and insufficient induction of LCFA oxidation and VLDL assembly/secretion.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22988513 PMCID: PMC3438780 DOI: 10.1155/2012/571281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipids ISSN: 2090-3049
Summary of the changes in liver mass, liver TG, and adipose tissue mass observed in previous mouse studies feeding different levels of trans-10, cis-12-CLA compared with feeding linoleic acid (LA) or oleic acid (as canola oil).
| Reference | Dose | Duration |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver mass | Liver TG/fat | Adipose mass | |||
| Clément et al. (2002) [ | 0.4% | 4 weeks | 3.1 fold ↑ | N.A1 | 80% ↓ |
| Halade et al. (2009) [ | 0.5% | 0.5 year | 50% ↑ | N.A | 73% ↓ |
| Degrace et al. (2003) [ | 10 g | 4 weeks | 60% ↑ | 655% ↑ | 83% ↓ |
| Kelley et al. (2004) [ | 0.5% | 8 weeks | N.A | 5 fold↑ | N.A |
| House et al. (2005) [ | 1% | 2 weeks | 33% ↑ | 61% ↑ | 58% ↓ |
| Warren et al. (2003) [ | 0.5% | 8 weeks | 98% ↑ | 427% ↑ | 59% ↓ |
| Degrace et al. (2004) [ | 1% | 4 weeks | 80% ↑ | 646% ↑ | 85% ↓ |
1Not available.
2Percentage = [Wt of CLA-fed Mice − Wt of LA or canola oil-fed Mice]/[Wt of LA or CO-fed Mice]×100.
Live body weight and weights of selected tissues and carcass in mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA (CLA).
| Treatment | SEM |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | CLA | |||
| Body weight (g) | 38.6 | 35.6 | 1.6 | 0.24 |
| Liver (g) | 1.99b | 2.36a | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| Epididymal adipose (g) | 0.91a | 0.70b | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Carcass (g) | 14.0a | 12.8b | 0.32 | 0.01 |
a,bMeans with different superscripts differ (P ≤ 0.05).
SEM: the largest standard error of the mean is shown.
Long-chain fatty acid concentrations in liver from mice fed control or the control supplemented with trans-10, cis-12-CLA (CLA). There were few significant interactions of treatment × time. Therefore, the results are presented according to main effects (treatment and time).
| Item | Treatment | Time | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | CLA | Week 2 | Week 6 | ||
| Total fatty acids, | 42.5b | 60.3a | 41.0b | 61.7a | 4.5 |
| 16: 0 | 22.5 | 24.1 | 28.6a | 17.9b | 1.2 |
| 18: 03 | 19.6a | 14.0b | 20.9a | 12.7b | 1.1 |
|
| 20.1b | 24.4a | 24.4a | 20.2b | 1.3 |
|
| 0.02b | 0.05a | 0.05a | 0.02b | 0.01 |
|
| 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
|
| 18.0 | 19.2 | 13.5b | 23.7a | 1.4 |
|
| 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.68a | 0.48b | 0.07 |
| CLA isomers | |||||
|
| 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
|
| <0.00b | 0.30a | 0.11b | 0.19a | 0.02 |
| Total1 | 0.13b | 0.46a | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.02 |
| 20: 4n-6 | 8.3 | 6.1 | 3.0b | 11.4a | 0.9 |
| 22: 6n-3 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 1.0b | 6.5a | 0.6 |
|
| |||||
| Total 20-carbon | 14.2 | 11.4 | 5.3b | 20.2a | 1.5 |
a,bMeans within each main effect (treatment and time) with different superscripts differ (P ≤ 0.05).
SEM: the largest standard error of the mean is shown.
1Significant treatment × time.
Hepatic expression of genes related to LCFA uptake, lipogenesis, TG synthesis, lipoprotein synthesis, and transcription regulation in mice fed control or the control supplemented with trans-10, cis-12-CLA. There were no significant interactions of treatment × time. Therefore, the results are presented according to main effects (treatment and time).
| Gene | Treatment | Time | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | CLA | Week 2 | Week 6 | ||
| Fatty acid uptake | |||||
|
| −1.47a | 1.11b | −0.01 | −0.35 | 0.55 |
|
| −0.23 | −0.04 | −0.07 | −0.20 | 0.18 |
| De novo synthesis and desaturation | |||||
|
| 0.22a | 0.72b | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.11 |
|
| −0.92a | 0.05b | −0.50 | −0.37 | 0.19 |
| TG and lipid droplet synthesis | |||||
|
| −0.02 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
|
| 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.15 |
|
| −0.31a | 0.44b | 0.13 | 0.004 | 0.17 |
|
| −1.74a | −0.29b | −0.80 | −1.24 | 0.62 |
|
| −0.43a | 0.40b | −0.01 | −0.02 | 0.18 |
| Transcription regulation | |||||
|
| −0.22 | −0.17 | −0.19 | −0.19 | 0.08 |
|
| −0.22a | 0.14 b | 0.04 | −0.11 | 0.11 |
| VLDL synthesis | |||||
|
| −0.33 | −0.05 | −0.09 | −0.29 | 0.19 |
|
| −1.13a | −0.04b | −0.35 | −0.81 | 0.50 |
|
| −0.37a | 0.14b | 0.002 | −0.22 | 0.17 |
| Carbohydrate Metabolism | |||||
|
| −0.45 | −0.49 | −0.31 | −0.63 | 0.28 |
|
| −0.31 | −0.08 | −0.08 | −0.32 | 0.28 |
|
| −0.07 | 0.21 | 0.18 | −0.04 | 0.14 |
| Lipolysis | |||||
|
| −0.95 | −0.20 | −0.15 | −1.00 | 0.54 |
|
| −0.04 | 0.14 | 0.24 | −0.13 | 0.24 |
a,bMeans within each main effect (treatment and time) with different superscripts differ (P ≤ 0.05).
SEM: the largest standard error of the mean is shown.
Hepatic expression of genes related to lipid catabolism in mice fed control or the control supplemented with trans-10, cis-12-CLA (CLA). There were no significant interactions of treatment × time. Therefore, the results are presented according to main effects (treatment and time).
| Gene | Treatment | Time | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | CLA | Week 2 | Week 6 | ||
| Fatty acid oxidation and energy metabolism | |||||
|
| −0.21 | −0.29 | −0.26 | −0.25 | 0.31 |
|
| −0.22a | 0.13b | −0.08 | −0.003 | 0.14 |
|
| −0.20a | 0.13b | 0.06 | −0.12 | 0.12 |
|
| −0.43 | −0.32 | −0.36 | −0.39 | 0.14 |
|
| −0.79 | 0.35 | −0.23 | −0.20 | 0.45 |
|
| 0.001 | −0.17 | −0.07 | −0.11 | 0.10 |
|
| −1.85a | 0.47b | −0.81 | −0.57 | 0.50 |
|
| −0.31a | 0.15b | −0.04 | −0.11 | 0.10 |
|
| −0.16a | 0.13b | 0.10a | −0.13b | 0.11 |
| Transcription regulation | |||||
|
| −0.33 | −0.19 | −0.23 | −0.30 | 0.12 |
a,bMeans within each main effect (treatment and time) with different superscripts differ (P ≤ 0.05).
SEM: the largest standard error of the mean is shown.
Hepatic expression of genes related to inflammation and cellular stress in mice fed control or the control supplemented with trans-10, cis-12-CLA (CLA). There were no significant interactions of treatment × time. Therefore, the results are presented according to main effects (treatment and time).
| Gene | Treatment | Time | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | CLA | Week 2 | Week 6 | ||
| Inflammation | |||||
|
| −0.50 | −0.21 | −0.17 | −0.54 | 0.31 |
| Stress response | |||||
|
| −0.54 | 0.07 | −0.26 | −0.21 | 0.42 |
|
| 0.01 | −0.29 | −0.53 | 0.25 | 0.35 |
|
| −0.27 | 0.17 | 0.16 | −0.26 | 0.46 |
|
| −0.25 | 0.37 | −0.11 | 0.24 | 0.30 |
|
| −0.55 | −0.10 | −0.32 | −0.32 | 0.49 |
|
| −0.09 | 0.19 | −0.58 | 0.68 | 0.49 |
|
| −1.04 | −0.54 | −0.91 | −0.67 | 0.62 |
|
| −1.15 | −0.55 | −0.46 | −1.23 | 0.63 |
a,bMeans within each main effect (treatment and time) with different superscripts differ (P ≤ 0.05).
SEM: the largest standard error of the mean is shown.