Literature DB >> 22988073

Programmed -1 frameshifting efficiency correlates with RNA pseudoknot conformational plasticity, not resistance to mechanical unfolding.

Dustin B Ritchie1, Daniel A N Foster, Michael T Woodside.   

Abstract

Programmed -1 frameshifting, whereby the reading frame of a ribosome on messenger RNA is shifted in order to generate an alternate gene product, is often triggered by a pseudoknot structure in the mRNA in combination with an upstream slippery sequence. The efficiency of frameshifting varies widely for different sites, but the factors that determine frameshifting efficiency are not yet fully understood. Previous work has suggested that frameshifting efficiency is related to the resistance of the pseudoknot against mechanical unfolding. We tested this hypothesis by studying the mechanical properties of a panel of pseudoknots with frameshifting efficiencies ranging from 2% to 30%: four pseudoknots from retroviruses, two from luteoviruses, one from a coronavirus, and a nonframeshifting bacteriophage pseudoknot. Using optical tweezers to apply tension across the RNA, we measured the distribution of forces required to unfold each pseudoknot. We found that neither the average unfolding force, nor the unfolding kinetics, nor the parameters describing the energy landscape for mechanical unfolding of the pseudoknot (energy barrier height and distance to the transition state) could be correlated to frameshifting efficiency. These results indicate that the resistance of pseudoknots to mechanical unfolding is not a primary determinant of frameshifting efficiency. However, increased frameshifting efficiency was correlated with an increased tendency to form alternate, incompletely folded structures, suggesting a more complex picture of the role of the pseudoknot involving the conformational dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22988073      PMCID: PMC3479558          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204114109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  61 in total

1.  Crystal structure of a luteoviral RNA pseudoknot and model for a minimal ribosomal frameshifting motif.

Authors:  Pradeep S Pallan; William S Marshall; Joel Harp; Frederic C Jewett; Zdzislaw Wawrzak; Bernard A Brown; Alexander Rich; Martin Egli
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Nanomechanical measurements of the sequence-dependent folding landscapes of single nucleic acid hairpins.

Authors:  Michael T Woodside; William M Behnke-Parks; Kevan Larizadeh; Kevin Travers; Daniel Herschlag; Steven M Block
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Theory, analysis, and interpretation of single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments.

Authors:  Olga K Dudko; Gerhard Hummer; Attila Szabo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A characteristic bent conformation of RNA pseudoknots promotes -1 frameshifting during translation of retroviral RNA.

Authors:  X Chen; H Kang; L X Shen; M Chamorro; H E Varmus; I Tinoco
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A functional -1 ribosomal frameshift signal in the human paraneoplastic Ma3 gene.

Authors:  Norma M Wills; Barry Moore; Andrew Hammer; Raymond F Gesteland; John F Atkins
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Footprinting analysis of BWYV pseudoknot-ribosome complexes.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Mazauric; Jean-Louis Leroy; Koen Visscher; Satoko Yoshizawa; Dominique Fourmy
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Ribosomal pausing at a frameshifter RNA pseudoknot is sensitive to reading phase but shows little correlation with frameshift efficiency.

Authors:  H Kontos; S Napthine; I Brierley
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Torsional restraint: a new twist on frameshifting pseudoknots.

Authors:  Ewan P Plant; Jonathan D Dinman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Signals for ribosomal frameshifting in the Rous sarcoma virus gag-pol region.

Authors:  T Jacks; H D Madhani; F R Masiarz; H E Varmus
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-11-04       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Minor groove RNA triplex in the crystal structure of a ribosomal frameshifting viral pseudoknot.

Authors:  L Su; L Chen; M Egli; J M Berger; A Rich
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-03
View more
  54 in total

1.  Absence of knots in known RNA structures.

Authors:  Cristian Micheletti; Marco Di Stefano; Henri Orland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Self-cleavage of the glmS ribozyme core is controlled by a fragile folding element.

Authors:  Andrew Savinov; Steven M Block
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A frameshifting stimulatory stem loop destabilizes the hybrid state and impedes ribosomal translocation.

Authors:  Hee-Kyung Kim; Fei Liu; Jingyi Fei; Carlos Bustamante; Ruben L Gonzalez; Ignacio Tinoco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Reconstructing folding energy landscapes by single-molecule force spectroscopy.

Authors:  Michael T Woodside; Steven M Block
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.981

5.  Single-molecule measurements of the CCR5 mRNA unfolding pathways.

Authors:  Michel de Messieres; Jen-Chien Chang; Ashton Trey Belew; Arturas Meskauskas; Jonathan D Dinman; Arthur La Porta
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Ribosomal frameshifting and transcriptional slippage: From genetic steganography and cryptography to adventitious use.

Authors:  John F Atkins; Gary Loughran; Pramod R Bhatt; Andrew E Firth; Pavel V Baranov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Mechanical strength of RNA knot in Zika virus protects against cellular defenses.

Authors:  Meng Zhao; Michael T Woodside
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  Complex dynamics under tension in a high-efficiency frameshift stimulatory structure.

Authors:  Matthew T J Halma; Dustin B Ritchie; Tonia R Cappellano; Krishna Neupane; Michael T Woodside
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Regulators of Viral Frameshifting: More Than RNA Influences Translation Events.

Authors:  Wesley D Penn; Haley R Harrington; Jonathan P Schlebach; Suchetana Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 10.431

10.  An RNA Element That Facilitates Programmed Ribosomal Readthrough in Turnip Crinkle Virus Adopts Multiple Conformations.

Authors:  Micki M Kuhlmann; Maitreyi Chattopadhyay; Vera A Stupina; Feng Gao; Anne E Simon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.