Literature DB >> 2298793

Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty.

D J Engelbrecht1, F A Weber, M B Sweet, I Jakim.   

Abstract

A total of 138 revision hip arthroplasties in 134 patients, all operated upon by one surgeon, were followed for an average of 7.4 years. The overall results were reasonable, with good to excellent Mayo hip scores in 62% and little or no pain in 86%. These results were independent of body weight, age, primary diagnosis and type of arthroplasty used. The incidence of radiological loosening was alarming, though comparable to that found in other series. Our findings indicate that it may be wise to replace both components even when, after careful assessment before and during operation, one of them seems to be securely fixed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2298793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  12 in total

1.  Relationship between the pelvic osteolytic volume on computed tomography and clinical outcome in patients with cementless acetabular components.

Authors:  Ho Hyun Yun; Won Yong Shon; Suk Joo Hong; Jung-Ro Yoon; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  C H Hartwig; P Böhm; U Czech; P Reize; W Küsswetter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Results of the cementless Plasmacup in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 72 cases with an average follow-up of eight years.

Authors:  Stefan Lakemeier; Guenter Aurand; Nina Timmesfeld; Thomas J Heyse; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  CT and MRI Assessment and Characterization Using Segmentation and 3D Modeling Techniques: Applications to Muscle, Bone and Brain.

Authors:  Paolo Gargiulo; Thordur Helgason; Ceon Ramon; Halldór Jónsson; Ugo Carraro
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2014-03-27

7.  Improving Planning and Post-Operative Assessment for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benedikt Magnússon; Þröstur Pétursson; Kyle Edmunds; Gígja Magnúsdóttir; Grétar Halldórsson; Halldór Jónsson; Paolo Gargiulo
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2015-03-11

8.  Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk Assessment to Optimize Prosthesis Selection in Total Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Þröstur Pétursson; Kyle Joseph Edmunds; Magnús Kjartan Gíslason; Benedikt Magnússon; Gígja Magnúsdóttir; Grétar Halldórsson; Halldór Jónsson; Paolo Gargiulo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Results of Wagner SL revision stem with impaction bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Somesh P Singh; Haresh P Bhalodiya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values of microbiological culture techniques for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Nicholas A Smith; Adnan Saithna; Andrew P Sprowson; Pedro Foguet
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.