Literature DB >> 22987437

Mortality audit of the Finnish cervical cancer screening program.

Stefan Lönnberg1, Pekka Nieminen, Tapio Luostarinen, Ahti Anttila.   

Abstract

Incidence-based evaluations of cervical cancer screening programs have suggested age-specific impacts and there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of screening outside the ages of 30-60 years. We audited the screening histories of cervical cancer deaths and conducted a case-control evaluation of the effectiveness of organized screening in different ages with mortality as outcome. We included all 506 cervical cancer deaths in Finland in 2000-2009 due to cancers diagnosed in 1990 or later, and 3,036 controls matched by age at diagnosis to the cases. Squamous cell carcinoma constituted 59% of the cases, adenocarcinomas 29%, and the remaining 12% were other specified and unspecified cervical malignancies. Most deaths (54%) were due to cancers diagnosed more than 5 years after last screening invitation, 24% were diagnosed among nonattenders and only 14% of deaths occurred among women who had attended invitational screening. The risk reduction associated with attending a single program screen at an age below 40 was nonsignificant (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.33-1.48), while clear risk reductions were observed after screening at the age of 40-54 (OR 0.33; CI 0.20-0.56) and 55-69 (OR 0.29; CI 0.16-0.54). This study also provides some indication of a long-lasting additional effect of screening at the age of 65. Possible avenues for improving the effectiveness of the Finnish screening program include efforts to increase attendance and an extension of the target ages to include 65-to 69-year-old women. The potential benefit of increasing the sensitivity of the screening test or shortening the screening interval is smaller.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22987437     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  17 in total

1.  Cervical screening and cervical cancer death among older women: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Alison S Rustagi; Aruna Kamineni; Sheila Weinmann; Susan D Reed; Polly Newcomb; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  The value of improving failures within a cervical cancer screening program: an example from Norway.

Authors:  Emily A Burger; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.

Authors:  Andrzej Nowakowski; Marek Cybulski; Andrzej Śliwczyński; Arkadiusz Chil; Zbigniew Teter; Przemysław Seroczyński; Marc Arbyn; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Cervical cancer screening in older women: new evidence and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Michelle I Silver; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Self-sampling to increase participation in cervical cancer screening: an RCT comparing home mailing, distribution in pharmacies, and recall letter.

Authors:  P Giorgi Rossi; C Fortunato; P Barbarino; S Boveri; S Caroli; A Del Mistro; A Ferro; C Giammaria; M Manfredi; T Moretto; A Pasquini; M Sideri; M C Tufi; C Cogo; E Altobelli
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing among Non-Attenders Increases Attendance to the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Espen Enerly; Jesper Bonde; Kristina Schee; Helle Pedersen; Stefan Lönnberg; Mari Nygård
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Breast carcinoma detection modes and death in a female population in relation to population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Tytti Sarkeala; Tapio Luostarinen; Tadeusz Dyba; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-07-08

10.  Self-sampling in cervical cancer screening: comparison of a brush-based and a lavage-based cervicovaginal self-sampling device.

Authors:  Liisa Karjalainen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen; Tapio Luostarinen; Anni Virtanen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.