Literature DB >> 22986836

Redefining global spinal balance: normative values of cranial center of mass from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic individuals.

Patrick A Sugrue1, Jamal McClendon, Timothy R Smith, Ryan J Halpin, Fadi F Nasr, Brian A OʼShaughnessy, Tyler R Koski.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective radiographical analysis of cranial center of mass (CCOM), C2, and C7 plumb lines in young and elderly asymptomatic individuals.
OBJECTIVE: To establish a normal range for craniosagittal balance for both young and elderly asymptomatic individuals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Global sagittal balance must account for the position of the head in relation to the spine and pelvis. The C7 plumb line defines thoracolumbar sagittal balance and has been shown to have significant impact on patient outcomes. However, the C7 plumb line fails to take into consideration the position of the head in relation to the pelvis.
METHODS: A total of 100 asymptomatic 20- to 40-year-old patients and 100 asymptomatic 60- to 80-year-old patients were enrolled. Standing plain radiographs of 14 × 36 in were obtained. CCOM, C2, and C7 plumb lines were drawn and measured from the superoposterior endplate of S1.
RESULTS: A total of 78 asymptomatic 20- to 40-year-old patients and 62 asymptomatic 60- to 80-year-old patients had adequate radiographs. The mean plumb line values in the 20- to 40-year-old patients and 60- to 80-year-old patients, respectively, were as follows; CCOM 9.0 mm (SD, 31.5 mm) and 41.2 mm (SD, 35.7 mm); C2 -2.7 mm (SD, 32.7 mm) and 32.1 mm (SD, 33.6 mm); and C7 -16.4 mm (SD, 31.5 mm) and 10.6 mm (SD, 27.8 mm). One-way analysis of variance and Student t tests confirmed that these mean plumb line values were significantly different between young and elderly patients (P < 0.001). The change at each level over time was highly correlated with the other levels (r > 0.97; P < 0.001) as did the degree of change between groups (r > 0.90, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Spinopelvic alignment in conjunction with CCOM has increased our understanding of spinal balance by including the head and may better represent true global spinal balance. CCOM is an easily measured parameter by using the nasion-inion technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22986836     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a1c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  A new quasi-invariant parameter characterizing the postural alignment of young asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Celia Amabile; Hélène Pillet; Virginie Lafage; Cédric Barrey; Jean-Marc Vital; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical spine alignment in the pediatric population: a radiographic normative study of 150 asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  K Abelin-Genevois; A Idjerouidene; P Roussouly; J M Vital; C Garin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  An analysis on the determinants of head to pelvic balance in a Chinese adult population.

Authors:  Zongshan Hu; Claudio Vergari; Laurent Gajny; Gene Chi-Wai Man; Kwong-Hang Yeung; Zhen Liu; Tsz-Ping Lam; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu; Jack Chun-Yiu Cheng; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

5.  Global malalignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the axial deformity is the main driver.

Authors:  Mohamad Karam; Ismat Ghanem; Claudio Vergari; Nour Khalil; Maria Saadé; Céline Chaaya; Ali Rteil; Elma Ayoub; Eddy Saad; Khalil Kharrat; Wafa Skalli; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  How Cervical Reconstruction Surgery Affects Global Spinal Alignment.

Authors:  Jun Mizutani; Russell Strom; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Kenji Endo; Ken Ishii; Mitsuru Yagi; Bobby Tay; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  The odontoid-CSVL distance in a global population of asymptomatic volunteers: normative values and implications for spinal coronal alignment.

Authors:  Scott L Zuckerman; Zeeshan M Sardar; Christopher S Lai; Gerard F Marciano; Mena G Kerolus; Ian A Buchanan; Alex S Ha; Meghan Cerpa; Michael P Kelly; Stéphane Bourret; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Hee-Kit Wong; Gabriel Liu; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Hend Riahi; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Novel Measurement Technique for the Sagittal Vertical Axis and Its Clinical Application in Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Go Yoshida; Kenta Kurosu; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Tatsuya Yasuda; Daisuke Togawa; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

9.  Analysis of Cervical Spine Alignment and its Relationship with Other Spinopelvic Parameters After Laminoplasty in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Seung Bo Jang; Hyung Min Lee; Jeong Hwan Lee; Min Uk Lee; Jeong Woo Kim; Jae Sung Yee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.