Literature DB >> 22986376

Development and validation of a coronary risk prediction model for older U.S. and European persons in the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rotterdam Study.

Michael T Koller1, Maarten J G Leening, Marcel Wolbers, Ewout W Steyerberg, M G Myriam Hunink, Rotraut Schoop, Albert Hofman, Heiner C Bucher, Bruce M Psaty, Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Jacqueline C M Witteman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk scores for prediction of coronary heart disease (CHD) in older adults are needed.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a sex-specific CHD risk prediction model for older adults that accounts for competing risks for death.
DESIGN: 2 observational cohort studies, using data from 4946 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) and 4303 participants in the Rotterdam Study (RS).
SETTING: Community settings in the United States (CHS) and Rotterdam, the Netherlands (RS). PARTICIPANTS: Persons aged 65 years or older who were free of cardiovascular disease. MEASUREMENTS: A composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction and coronary death.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 16.5 and 14.9 years, 1166 CHS and 698 RS participants had CHD events, respectively. Deaths from noncoronary causes largely exceeded the number of CHD events, complicating accurate CHD risk predictions. The prediction model had moderate ability to discriminate between events and nonevents (c-statistic, 0.63 in both U.S. and European men and 0.67 and 0.68 in U.S. and European women). The model was well-calibrated; predicted risks were in good agreement with observed risks. Compared with the Framingham point scores, the prediction model classified elderly U.S. persons into higher risk categories but elderly European persons into lower risk categories. Differences in classification accuracy were not consistent and depended on cohort and sex. Adding newer cardiovascular risk markers to the model did not substantially improve performance. LIMITATION: The model may be less applicable in nonwhite populations, and the comparison Framingham model was not designed for adults older than 79 years.
CONCLUSION: A CHD risk prediction model that accounts for deaths from noncoronary causes among older adults provided well-calibrated risk estimates but was not substantially more accurate than Framingham point scores. Moreover, adding newer risk markers did not improve accuracy. These findings emphasize the difficulties of predicting CHD risk in elderly persons and the need to improve these predictions. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research; and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986376      PMCID: PMC3644640          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  49 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; S Grundy; L M Sullivan; P Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the prospective cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) study.

Authors:  Gerd Assmann; Paul Cullen; Helmut Schulte
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Commentary: Reporting standards are needed for evaluations of risk reclassification.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Holly Janes
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  S S Franklin; M G Larson; S A Khan; N D Wong; E P Leip; W B Kannel; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Determinants of peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: the Rotterdam study.

Authors:  W T Meijer; D E Grobbee; M G Hunink; A Hofman; A W Hoes
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-23

7.  Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  James Shepherd; Gerard J Blauw; Michael B Murphy; Edward L E M Bollen; Brendan M Buckley; Stuart M Cobbe; Ian Ford; Allan Gaw; Michael Hyland; J Wouter Jukema; Adriaan M Kamper; Peter W Macfarlane; A Edo Meinders; John Norrie; Chris J Packard; Ivan J Perry; David J Stott; Brian J Sweeney; Cillian Twomey; Rudi G J Westendorp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany--results from the MONICA Augsburg and the PROCAM cohorts.

Authors:  Hans-Werner Hense; Helmut Schulte; Hannelore Löwel; Gerd Assmann; Ulrich Keil
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Competing risks and the clinical community: irrelevance or ignorance?

Authors:  Michael T Koller; Heike Raatz; Ewout W Steyerberg; Marcel Wolbers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Methods of data collection and definitions of cardiac outcomes in the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Maarten J G Leening; Maryam Kavousi; Jan Heeringa; Frank J A van Rooij; Jolande Verkroost-van Heemst; Jaap W Deckers; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Gijsbertus Ziere; Albert Hofman; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 8.082

View more
  32 in total

1.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Events in Black Adults: The Jackson Heart Study Cohort.

Authors:  Ervin R Fox; Tandaw E Samdarshi; Solomon K Musani; Michael J Pencina; Jung Hye Sung; Alain G Bertoni; Vanessa Xanthakis; Pelbreton C Balfour; Satya S Shreenivas; Carolyn Covington; Philip R Liebson; Daniel F Sarpong; Kenneth R Butler; Thomas H Mosley; Wayne D Rosamond; Aaron R Folsom; David M Herrington; Ramachandran S Vasan; Herman A Taylor
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Should non-cardiovascular mortality be considered in the SCORE model? Findings from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) cohort.

Authors:  Biniyam G Demissei; Douwe Postmus; Mattia A Valente; Pim van der Harst; Wijk H van Gilst; Edwin R Van den Heuvel; Hans L Hillege
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results.

Authors:  M Arfan Ikram; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in older adults with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Joshua I Barzilay; Kenneth J Mukamal; Jorge R Kizer
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.076

7.  The role of previous falls in major osteoporotic fracture prediction in conjunction with FRAX in older Chinese men and women: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Y Su; J Leung; T Kwok
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks.

Authors:  Marcel Wolbers; Paul Blanche; Michael T Koller; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Thomas A Gerds
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Physical Activity Types and Health-Related Quality of Life among Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  C M Koolhaas; K Dhana; F J A van Rooij; J D Schoufour; A Hofman; O H Franco
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  Long-term trajectory of two unique cardiac biomarkers and subsequent left ventricular structural pathology and risk of incident heart failure in community-dwelling older adults at low baseline risk.

Authors:  Danielle Glick; Christopher R deFilippi; Robert Christenson; John S Gottdiener; Stephen L Seliger
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 12.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.