Literature DB >> 22986353

Gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for the assessment of rectal cancer lymph nodes: predictive criteria.

Doenja M J Lambregts1, Luc A Heijnen, Monique Maas, Iris J G Rutten, Milou H Martens, Walter H Backes, Robert G Riedl, Frans C H Bakers, Vincent C Cappendijk, Geerard L Beets, Regina G H Beets-Tan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To confirm the use of the nodal signal intensity (SI) and the 'chemical shift' artefact as diagnostic criteria for detecting nodal metastases from rectal cancer on gadofosveset contrast-enhanced MRI.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients underwent a non-enhanced and gadofosveset-enhanced 3D-T1W GRE-MRI at 1.5T. For each lymph node, the SI of the middle part of the node (mSI) and white rim of the chemical shift artefact encircling the node (wSI) were measured on the non-enhanced and gadofosveset-enhanced images. Second, the aspect of the chemical shift artefact encircling the nodes was scored using a 4-point scale. Results were compared with histology on a node-by-node basis.
RESULTS: 289 nodes (55 N+) were analysed. On gadofosveset-MRI, mSI and wSI were significantly higher for the benign than for the metastatic lymph nodes (p < 0.001). Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for identification of metastases were 0.74 (mSI) and 0.73 (wSI). The chemical shift criterion rendered an AUC of 0.85. The combination of mSI and the chemical shift criterion resulted in an AUC of 0.88 and the rendered an AUC of 0.86-0.92 when subjectively (visually) assessed by two independent readers.
CONCLUSIONS: Benign lymph nodes show significant contrast enhancement after gadofosveset injection, while metastatic nodes do not. The uptake of gadofosveset in the nodes also affects the chemical shift artefact encircling the nodes. Combined assessment of these two features on gadofosveset-enhanced MRI provides a high diagnostic performance for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22986353     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-012-9957-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  19 in total

Review 1.  MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; Camila Carlos Tavares Rocha; Brunna Clemente Oliveira; Iva Petkovska; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Tumor-induced alterations in lymph node lymph drainage identified by contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Alanna Ruddell; Sara B Kirschbaum; Sheila N Ganti; Cheng-Liang Liu; Ryan R Sun; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Performance of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for staging rectal cancer nodes: can the initial promising results be reproduced?

Authors:  Luc A Heijnen; Doenja M J Lambregts; Milou H Martens; Monique Maas; Frans C H Bakers; Vincent C Cappendijk; Pedro Oliveira; Guido Lammering; Robert G Riedl; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MR imaging probes: design and applications.

Authors:  Eszter Boros; Eric M Gale; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  Chemical shift effect predicting lymph node status in rectal cancer using high-resolution MR imaging with node-for-node matched histopathological validation.

Authors:  Hongmei Zhang; Chongda Zhang; Zhaoxu Zheng; Feng Ye; Yuan Liu; Shuangmei Zou; Chunwu Zhou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI might improve locoregional staging of breast cancer patients prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Briete Goorts; Stefan Vöö; Thiemo J A van Nijnatten; Loes F S Kooreman; Maaike de Boer; Kristien B M I Keymeulen; Romy Aarnoutse; Joachim E Wildberger; Felix M Mottaghy; Marc B I Lobbes; Marjolein L Smidt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Technique to match mesorectal lymph nodes imaging findings to histopathology: node-by-node comparison.

Authors:  Zixuan Zhuang; Xueqin Ma; Yang Zhang; Xuyang Yang; Mingtian Wei; Xiangbing Deng; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.322

8.  Value of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI and multiplanar reformatting for selecting good responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Luc A Heijnen; Monique Maas; Max J Lahaye; Ulrich Lalji; Doenja M J Lambregts; Milou H Martens; Robert G Riedl; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Clinical relevance of morphologic MRI criteria for the assessment of lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabian Doyon; Ulrike I Attenberger; Dietmar J Dinter; Stefan O Schoenberg; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a node-for-node comparative study of MRI and histopathology.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Lijuan Wan; Wenjing Peng; Shuangmei Zou; Zhaoxu Zheng; Feng Ye; Jun Jiang; Han Ouyang; Xinming Zhao; Hongmei Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.