Literature DB >> 22985207

Comparison of buccal and nasal dexmedetomidine premedication for pediatric patients.

Z Serhan Cimen1, Ayse Hanci, G Ulufer Sivrikaya, Leyla T Kilinc, Melahat K Erol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists are used to premedicate pediatric patients to reduce separation anxiety and achieve calm induction. The clinical effects of clonidine are similar whether via the oral or nasal route. However, oral dexmedetomidine is not preferred because of its poor bioavailability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of nasal versus buccal dexmedetomidine used for premedication in children.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients, aged 2-6 years, undergoing minor elective surgery were randomly assigned to two groups to receive dexmedetomidine, either 1 μg·kg(-1) buccally (group B) or 1 μg·kg(-1) intranasally (group N) for premedication 45 min before the induction of anesthesia. Heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate were measured before and every 10 min after administering dexmedetomidine in all children. Level of sedation was assessed every 10 min until transport to operating room. Drug acceptance, parental separation, and face mask acceptance scores were recorded.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in patient characteristics, nor was there any significant difference between the two groups in heart rate, respiratory rate, or SpO(2) values at all times after premedication. Levels of sedation, parental separation, and mask acceptance scores were significantly higher in group N than in group B at the various times.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that intranasal administration of 1 μg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine is more effective than buccal administration of 1 μg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine for premedication in children.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22985207     DOI: 10.1111/pan.12025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  16 in total

Review 1.  Options and Considerations for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Imaging.

Authors:  John W Berkenbosch
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Dexmedetomidine in current anaesthesia practice- a review.

Authors:  Shagufta Naaz; Erum Ozair
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-10-20

Review 3.  Dexmedetomidine in paediatric anaesthesia.

Authors:  R Lin; J M Ansermino
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-07-22

4.  Comment on: "Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation in Children, a Suitable Alternative to Chloral Hydrate".

Authors:  M S Raghuraman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation in Children, a Suitable Alternative to Chloral Hydrate.

Authors:  Giorgio Cozzi; Stefania Norbedo; Egidio Barbi
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Comparative Effectiveness of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam versus Oral Chloral Hydrate Targeting Moderate Sedation during Pediatric Transthoracic Echocardiograms.

Authors:  Jordan Fett; Richard Hackbarth; Brian M Boville; Anthony D Olivero; Alan T Davis; John W Winters
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-12-26

7.  Subcutaneously administered dexmedetomidine is efficiently absorbed and is associated with attenuated cardiovascular effects in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  P Uusalo; D Al-Ramahi; I Tilli; R A Aantaa; M Scheinin; T I Saari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal dexmedetomidine as a premedication before general anesthesia in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Priyanka Dwivedi; Tejas K Patel; Vijeta Bajpai; Yashpal Singh; Alka Tripathi; Suerkha Kishore
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.713

9.  Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation.

Authors:  Aslihan Tug; Ayse Hanci; Hacer Sebnem Turk; Ferda Aybey; Canan Tulay Isil; Pinar Sayin; Sibel Oba
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Oral transmucosal administration of dexmedetomidine for sedation in 4 dogs.

Authors:  Anne E Cohen; Sara L Bennett
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.008

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.