Literature DB >> 22984980

Factors affecting diagnostic yield in needle biopsy for brain lesions.

Georgios Tsermoulas1, Nitin Mukerji, Amlan Jyoti Borah, Patrick Mitchell, Nicholas Ross.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We analyse the factors that are associated with the diagnostic yield of needle brain biopsy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a retrospective series of 124 consecutive biopsies in a 30-month period. Patients' demographics (age, gender), lesion topography (side, location, depth), lesion characteristics (histology, volume, radiological enhancement), type of biopsy procedure (freehand, ultrasound guided, frameless and frame-based stereotactic) and the use of intraoperative histologic examination were correlated with the diagnostic rate. Descriptive statistics and a nominal logistic regression model were used to evaluate the factors influencing diagnostic yield.
RESULTS: 63 men and 61 women were included in the study with mean age 59.2 (range: 16-86). 55 were frame-based stereotactic biopsies, 33 were frameless stereotactic biopsies, 29 biopsies were performed under ultrasound guidance and 7 freehand. The diagnostic yield in our series is 93.5%. The gender, lesion topography, biopsy method, use of intraoperative histology and enhancement did not correlate with the diagnostic yield. Younger age had a negative impact on diagnostic yield. 6 out of 8 inconclusive biopsies were in non-glial lesions (p < 0.05). The odds of obtaining a positive diagnosis increased sevenfold with every cc increase in lesion volume.
CONCLUSION: The age of the patient, the volume and the histology of the brain lesion had an impact on the diagnostic yield of needle biopsy. None of the other factors significantly influenced the diagnostic rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22984980     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.722239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  6 in total

1.  Venture in 101 Cranial Punctures: A Comparative Study between Frame-based versus Frameless Biopsy of 101 Intracranial Space Occupying Lesion.

Authors:  Suresh Bishokarma; Pratyush Shrestha; Sagar Koirala; Manita Raut; Dinesh Nath Gongal
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

2.  A Comparation Between Frame-Based and Robot-Assisted in Stereotactic Biopsy.

Authors:  Yue Hu; Pu Cai; Huawei Zhang; Aihemaitiniyazi Adilijiang; Jun Peng; Yun Li; Shanli Che; Fei Lan; Changqing Liu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 3.  Clinical outcomes as a function of the number of samples taken during stereotactic needle biopsies: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay Dhawan; Andrew S Venteicher; William E Butler; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Stereotactic biopsy for lesions in brainstem and deep brain: a single-center experience of 72 cases.

Authors:  Feng Qin; Zhenchao Huang; Qing Dong; Xiaofeng Xu; Tingting Lu; Jianning Chen; Na Cheng; Wei Qiu; Zhengqi Lu
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Clinical Experience with Frame Based Stereotactic Biopsy for Intracranial Space Occupying Lesion.

Authors:  Suresh Bishokarma; Shikher Shrestha; Munu Napit; Dinesh Nath Gongal
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.406

6.  Evaluation of 311 contemporary cases of stereotactic biopsies in patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions-diagnostic yield and management of non-diagnostic cases.

Authors:  Krystyna Agnieszka Pasternak; Michael Schwake; Nils Warneke; Max Masthoff; Samer Zawy Alsofy; Eric Suero Molina; Walter Stummer; Stephanie Schipmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.042

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.