Literature DB >> 22984797

Mediating effects of processing speed and executive functions in age-related differences in episodic memory performance: a cross-validation study.

Teresa Lee1, John D Crawford1, Julie D Henry2, Julian N Trollor1, Nicole A Kochan1, Margaret J Wright2, David Ames3, Henry Brodaty1, Perminder S Sachdev1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Age differences in episodic memory (memory) have been attributed to a general reduction in processing speed (the "speed mediation hypothesis"), but also to declines in the efficiency of executive functions operations ("executive decline hypothesis"). To test predictions from these competing models, we examined the mediating effects of processing speed (speed) and executive functions (executive) on age and episodic memory in three older adult cohorts.
METHOD: The first sample comprised 842 individuals from the Sydney Memory and Aging Study (MAS). The second and third samples included 476 individuals from the Older Australian Twins Study (OATS), with each twin from a pair randomly assigned to form two samples. A series of regression analyses was performed on each of the three samples independently, so as to obtain the sizes and statistical significances of the indirect effects of age on each of the memory variables, mediated by each of the Executive and Speed composites. Sex was a control variable for all analyses. Analyses were repeated with current depression as an additional control variable.
RESULTS: Data from the MAS sample suggested that both Speed and Executive composites were significant mediators, with the former having a stronger mediation effect. A similar pattern was found in the two OATS samples.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with those of previous studies in which speed had a stronger mediating effect than executive on age-related variation in memory. They provide further support for the speed mediation hypothesis, although not negating the executive decline hypothesis. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22984797     DOI: 10.1037/a0030053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  7 in total

1.  Is episodic memory performance more vulnerable to depressive affect in older adulthood?

Authors:  Jarrett Evans; Neil Charness; Katinka Dijkstra; Joanna M Fitzgibbons; Jong-Sung Yoon
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2018-01-09

2.  Age effects in autobiographical memory depend on the measure.

Authors:  Ali Mair; Marie Poirier; Martin A Conway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The role of processing speed in the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - revised.

Authors:  Joyce W Tam; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Generalized neurocognitive impairment in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: The possible key role of slowed processing speed.

Authors:  Lasse Randers; Jens Richardt Møllegaard Jepsen; Birgitte Fagerlund; Dorte Nordholm; Kristine Krakauer; Carsten Hjorthøj; Birte Glenthøj; Merete Nordentoft
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Memory Trajectories Before and After First and Recurrent Strokes.

Authors:  Wentian Lu; Marcus Richards; David Werring; Martin Bobak
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Psychological well-being and cognitive aging in Black, Native American, and White Alzheimer's Disease Research Center participants.

Authors:  Mary F Wyman; Carol A Van Hulle; Emre Umucu; Sydnee Livingston; Nickolas H Lambrou; Fabu P Carter; Sterling C Johnson; Sanjay Asthana; Carey E Gleason; Megan Zuelsdorff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Glucose administration and cognitive function: differential effects of age and effort during a dual task paradigm in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Helen Macpherson; Bernadette Roberstson; Sandra Sünram-Lea; Con Stough; David Kennedy; Andrew Scholey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.