Hua Fang1, Veronica R Placencio, Yves A DeClerck. 1. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is a protease inhibitor but is paradoxically associated with poor outcomes in cancer patients. However, the mechanisms of its effects on tumor cells have not been explored. METHODS: Endogenous PAI-1 in human tumor cell lines (HT-1080, A549, HCT-116, and MDA-MB-231) was suppressed by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and PAI-039, a small molecule inhibitor of PAI-1, and the effects on apoptosis were examined. Tumorigenicity of PAI-1 knockdown (KD) tumor cells was examined in immunodeficient PAI-1 wild-type and knockout (KO) mice (9-15 per group), and event-free survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of PAI-1 suppression on HT-1080 xenotransplanted tumors was evaluated for cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of PAI-1 in the four tumor cell lines increased spontaneous apoptosis (mean fold increase relative to control: HT-1080, siRNA#1, mean = 4.0, 95% CI = 2.6 to 5.3, P < .001; siRNA#2, mean = 2.6, 95% CI = 2.4 to 2.9, P < .001, Student t test), which was blocked in the presence of recombinant PAI-1, a caspase-8 inhibitor, or Fas/FasL neutralizing antibodies and was partially attenuated by a plasmin inhibitor-aprotinin. PAI-1 KO mice implanted with PAI-1 KD HT-1080 cells had decreased tumorigenesis and prolonged survival compared with control mice (P = .002, log-rank test), and their tumors exhibited decreased cell proliferation and angiogenesis and increased apoptosis. Furthermore, five of 15 PAI-1 KO mice implanted with PAI-1 KD HT-1080 cells never developed tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that PAI-1 exerts a protective effect against tumor cell apoptosis by a mechanism that, in part, involves plasmin activation and inhibition of Fas/Fas-L-mediated apoptosis and may be a promising therapeutic target.
BACKGROUND:Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is a protease inhibitor but is paradoxically associated with poor outcomes in cancerpatients. However, the mechanisms of its effects on tumor cells have not been explored. METHODS: Endogenous PAI-1 in humantumor cell lines (HT-1080, A549, HCT-116, and MDA-MB-231) was suppressed by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and PAI-039, a small molecule inhibitor of PAI-1, and the effects on apoptosis were examined. Tumorigenicity of PAI-1 knockdown (KD) tumor cells was examined in immunodeficient PAI-1 wild-type and knockout (KO) mice (9-15 per group), and event-free survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of PAI-1 suppression on HT-1080 xenotransplanted tumors was evaluated for cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of PAI-1 in the four tumor cell lines increased spontaneous apoptosis (mean fold increase relative to control: HT-1080, siRNA#1, mean = 4.0, 95% CI = 2.6 to 5.3, P < .001; siRNA#2, mean = 2.6, 95% CI = 2.4 to 2.9, P < .001, Student t test), which was blocked in the presence of recombinant PAI-1, a caspase-8 inhibitor, or Fas/FasL neutralizing antibodies and was partially attenuated by a plasmin inhibitor-aprotinin. PAI-1 KO mice implanted with PAI-1 KD HT-1080 cells had decreased tumorigenesis and prolonged survival compared with control mice (P = .002, log-rank test), and their tumors exhibited decreased cell proliferation and angiogenesis and increased apoptosis. Furthermore, five of 15 PAI-1 KO mice implanted with PAI-1 KD HT-1080 cells never developed tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that PAI-1 exerts a protective effect against tumor cell apoptosis by a mechanism that, in part, involves plasmin activation and inhibition of Fas/Fas-L-mediated apoptosis and may be a promising therapeutic target.
Authors: J R Masters; J A Thomson; B Daly-Burns; Y A Reid; W G Dirks; P Packer; L H Toji; T Ohno; H Tanabe; C F Arlett; L R Kelland; M Harrison; A Virmani; T H Ward; K L Ayres; P G Debenham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-06-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C Isogai; W E Laug; H Shimada; P J Declerck; M F Stins; D L Durden; A Erdreich-Epstein; Y A DeClerck Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Maria Seddighzadeh; Gunnar Steineck; Per Larsson; Hans Wijkström; Ulf Norming; Erik Onelöv; Stig Linder Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2002-06-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: J H de Witte; J A Foekens; N Brünner; J J Heuvel; T van Tienoven; M P Look; J G Klijn; A Geurts-Moespot; N Grebenchtchikov; T Benraad; C G Sweep Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-07-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Marta Helena Kubala; Vasu Punj; Veronica Rae Placencio-Hickok; Hua Fang; G Esteban Fernandez; Richard Sposto; Yves Albert DeClerck Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Manuel Valiente; Anna C Obenauf; Xin Jin; Qing Chen; Xiang H-F Zhang; Derek J Lee; Jamie E Chaft; Mark G Kris; Jason T Huse; Edi Brogi; Joan Massagué Journal: Cell Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 41.582