Literature DB >> 22983810

Socio-economic inequalities in health, habits and self-care during pregnancy in Spain.

Isabel Larrañaga1, Loreto Santa-Marina, Haizea Begiristain, Mónica Machón, Martine Vrijheid, Maribel Casas, Adonina Tardón, Ana Fernández-Somoano, Sabrina Llop, Clara L Rodriguez-Bernal, Mariana F Fernandez.   

Abstract

Socioeconomic disadvantage can be harmful for mother's health and can influence child's health long term. The aim of this study is to analyse social inequalities between pregnant women from four INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente) cohorts. The analysis included 2,607 pregnant women recruited between 2004 and 2008 from four INMA cohorts. Data on maternal characteristics were collected through two questionnaires completed in the first and third trimester of pregnancy. The relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and maternal health, dietary intake, lifestyle habits and self-care related variables was modelled using logistic regression analysis. 33.5 % of women had a university level of education and 47 % had high occupational class. Women with higher SES reported healthier habits, fewer complications during pregnancy, better weight gain control and attended more prenatal appointments than women with lower SES. The risk of sedentary behaviour and passive smoking was higher among women with a lower level of education (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI 1.3-2.2 and OR = 1.6, 95 % CI 1.2-2.3, respectively) and with less skilled occupations (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI 1.4-2.0 and OR = 1.2, 95 % CI 1.0-1.5, respectively). Although both SES indicators-occupation and education-act as social determinants of diet, occupation was a more powerful determinant than education. For other lifestyle and self-caring variables, education was a more powerful predictor than occupation. Social inequalities were observed in health, habits and self-care during pregnancy. Proper care during pregnancy requires the control of common clinical variables and the knowledge of socioeconomic conditions of the pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22983810     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1134-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  33 in total

1.  Costs of a healthy diet: analysis from the UK Women's Cohort Study.

Authors:  J Cade; H Upmeier; C Calvert; D Greenwood
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Unplanned pregnancy as a major determinant in inadequate use of prenatal care.

Authors:  M Delgado-Rodríguez; M Gómez-Olmedo; A Bueno-Cavanillas; R Gálvez-Vargas
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study.

Authors:  Zhong-Cheng Luo; Russell Wilkins; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Prenatal multivitamin supplementation and rates of congenital anomalies: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Ingrid Goh; Enkelejd Bollano; Thomas R Einarson; Gideon Koren
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-08

5.  [Prevalence of obesity in pregnant women of Canary Islands, Spain].

Authors:  Inmaculada Bautista-Castaño; Nestor Alemán-Perez; Jose Juan García-Salvador; Alicia González-Quesada; Jose Angel García-Hernández; Lluis Serra-Majem
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.725

6.  The role of mediating factors in the association between social deprivation and low birth weight in Germany.

Authors:  Birgit Reime; Pamela A Ratner; Sandra N Tomaselli-Reime; Ann Kelly; Beate A Schuecking; Paul Wenzlaff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  How disturbed sleep may be a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Michele L Okun; James M Roberts; Anna L Marsland; Martica Hall
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.347

8.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  [Socioeconomic inequalities in the provision and uptake of prenatal care].

Authors:  Gemma Cano-Serral; Maica Rodríguez-Sanz; Carme Borrell; María del Mar Pérez; Joaquín Salvador
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.139

10.  RETIRED: Pre-conceptional vitamin/folic acid supplementation 2007: the use of folic acid in combination with a multivitamin supplement for the prevention of neural tube defects and other congenital anomalies.

Authors:  R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2007-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Estimating Micronutrient Intakes in an Urban US Sample of Multi-Ethnic Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Kelly J Brunst; Srimathi Kannan; Yu-Ming Ni; Chris Gennings; Harish B Ganguri; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-02

2.  Maternity Leave Policies: Trade-Offs Between Labour Market Demands and Health Benefits for Children.

Authors:  Lucy Strang; Miriam Broeks
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Dietary and health profiles of Spanish women in preconception, pregnancy and lactation.

Authors:  Marta Cuervo; Carmen Sayon-Orea; Susana Santiago; Jose Alfredo Martínez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Thyroglobulin level at week 16 of pregnancy is superior to urinary iodine concentration in revealing preconceptual and first trimester iodine supply.

Authors:  Monika Katko; Andrea Anett Gazso; Ildiko Hircsu; Harjit Pal Bhattoa; Zsuzsanna Molnar; Bela Kovacs; David Andrasi; Janos Aranyosi; Rita Makai; Lajos Veress; Olga Torok; Miklos Bodor; Laszlo Samson; Endre V Nagy
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Human Development Index (HDI) of the maternal country of origin as a predictor of perinatal outcomes - a longitudinal study conducted in Spain.

Authors:  S Garcia-Tizon Larroca; J Arevalo-Serrano; A Duran Vila; M P Pintado Recarte; I Cueto Hernandez; A Solis Pierna; S Lizarraga Bonelli; J De Leon-Luis
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The Development and Usability Assessment of an mHealth Application to Encourage Self-Care in Pregnant Women against COVID-19.

Authors:  Khadijeh Moulaei; Abbas Sheikhtaheri; Zahra Ghafaripour; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  The burden of OASIS increases along with socioeconomic position--register-based analysis of 980,733 births in Finland.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Rufus Cartwright; Mika Gissler; Michael R Kramer; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The relationship between socioeconomic indicators during pregnancy and gynecological appointment at any time after childbirth.

Authors:  Alexandre Faisal-Cury; Julieta Quayle; Tatiana Marques; Paulo Rossi Menezes; Alicia Matijasevich
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-08-12

9.  New index of social deprivation during pregnancy: results from a national study in France.

Authors:  Marion Opatowski; Béatrice Blondel; Babak Khoshnood; Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Application of space-time disease clustering by administrative databases in Italy: Adverse Reproductive Outcomes (AROs) and residential exposure.

Authors:  Pamela Barbadoro; Massimo Agostini; Marcello M D'Errico; Francesco Di Stanislao; Fabio Filippetti; Sara Giuliani; Emilia Prospero
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2015-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.