Literature DB >> 22983793

Fibroblasts influence muscle progenitor differentiation and alignment in contact independent and dependent manners in organized co-culture devices.

Nikhil Rao1, Samantha Evans, Danique Stewart, Katrina H Spencer, Farah Sheikh, Elliot E Hui, Karen L Christman.   

Abstract

Myoblasts are precursor muscle cells that lie nascent to mature skeletal muscle. Once muscle is damaged, these cells migrate, fuse, and regenerate the muscle tissue. It is known that skeletal muscle can partially regenerate in vivo after muscle tissue damage. However, this regeneration does not always occur, especially in more severe injuries. Cellular therapy using tissue-engineering approaches has been shown to improve organ repair and function. To exploit potential benefits of using cell therapy as an avenue for skeletal muscle repair, it is important to understand the cellular dynamics underlying skeletal myocyte formation and growth. Cardiac fibroblasts have been shown to have a major influence on cardiomyocyte function, repair, and overall spatial distribution. However, little is known regarding fibroblasts' role on skeletal myocyte function. In this study, we utilized a reconfigurable co-culture device to understand the contact and paracrine effects of fibroblasts on skeletal myocyte alignment and differentiation using murine myoblast and fibroblast cell lines. We demonstrate that myotube alignment is increased by direct contact with fibroblasts, while myotube differentiation is reduced both in the gap and contact configurations with fibroblasts after 6 days of co-culture. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies to FGF-2 can block these effects of fibroblasts on myotube differentiation and alignment. Finally, bi-directional signaling is critical to the observed myoblast-fibroblast interactions, since conditioned media could not reproduce the same effects observed in the gap configuration. These findings could have direct implications on cell therapies for repairing skeletal muscle, which have only utilized skeletal myoblasts or stem cell populations alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22983793      PMCID: PMC3537877          DOI: 10.1007/s10544-012-9709-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  40 in total

1.  Myofibroblasts protect myoblasts from intrinsic apoptosis associated with differentiation via β1 integrin-PI3K/Akt pathway.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Hai Li; Zhengxing Lian; Ning Li
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.053

2.  Tumor endothelin-1 enhances metastatic colonization of the lung in mouse xenograft models of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Neveen Said; Steven Smith; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Cardiac fibroblasts influence cardiomyocyte phenotype in vitro.

Authors:  W A LaFramboise; D Scalise; P Stoodley; S R Graner; R D Guthrie; J A Magovern; M J Becich
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  Heterogeneity among muscle precursor cells in adult skeletal muscles with differing regenerative capacities.

Authors:  G K Pavlath; D Thaloor; T A Rando; M Cheong; A W English; B Zheng
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.780

5.  Coaxial electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone), multiwalled carbon nanotubes, and polyacrylic acid/polyvinyl alcohol scaffold for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.

Authors:  K D McKeon-Fischer; D H Flagg; J W Freeman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Preferential accumulation and export of high molecular weight FGF-2 by rat cardiac non-myocytes.

Authors:  Jon-Jon Santiago; Xin Ma; Leslie J McNaughton; Barbara E Nickel; Brian P Bestvater; Liping Yu; Robert R Fandrich; Thomas Netticadan; Elissavet Kardami
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factors, and platelet-derived growth factor-BB stimulate proliferation of clonally derived porcine myogenic satellite cells.

Authors:  M E Doumit; D R Cook; R A Merkel
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  RhoE controls myoblast alignment prior fusion through RhoA and ROCK.

Authors:  M Fortier; F Comunale; J Kucharczak; A Blangy; S Charrasse; C Gauthier-Rouvière
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 15.828

9.  Nitric oxide regulates tumor cell cross-talk with stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment of the liver.

Authors:  Ningling Kang Decker; Soha S Abdelmoneim; Usman Yaqoob; Helen Hendrickson; Joe Hormes; Mike Bentley; Henry Pitot; Raul Urrutia; Greg J Gores; Vijay H Shah
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Aberrant repair and fibrosis development in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Christopher J Mann; Eusebio Perdiguero; Antonio L Serrano; Yacine Kharraz; Susana Aguilar; Patrizia Pessina; Pura Muñoz-Cánoves
Journal:  Skelet Muscle       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.912

View more
  18 in total

1.  Human stroma and epithelium co-culture in a microfluidic model of a human prostate gland.

Authors:  L Jiang; F Ivich; S Tahsin; M Tran; S B Frank; C K Miranti; Y Zohar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Cellular senescence induces replication stress with almost no affect on DNA replication timing.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia; Hélène Schwerer; Emilie Besnard; Romain Desprat; Claudia Trevilla-Garcia; Jiao Sima; Paul Bensadoun; Anissa Zouaoui; David M Gilbert; Jean-Marc Lemaitre
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Patterning of sharp cellular interfaces with a reconfigurable elastic substrate.

Authors:  Allison Curtis; David J Li; Brian DeVeale; Kento Onishi; Monica Y Kim; Robert Blelloch; Diana J Laird; Elliot E Hui
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Engineering an Injectable Muscle-Specific Microenvironment for Improved Cell Delivery Using a Nanofibrous Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel.

Authors:  Nikhil Rao; Gillie Agmon; Matthew T Tierney; Jessica L Ungerleider; Rebecca L Braden; Alessandra Sacco; Karen L Christman
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  * Skeletal Myoblast-Seeded Vascularized Tissue Scaffolds in the Treatment of a Large Volumetric Muscle Defect in the Rat Biceps Femoris Muscle.

Authors:  Mon-Tzu Li; Marissa A Ruehle; Hazel Y Stevens; Nick Servies; Nick J Willett; Sukhita Karthikeyakannan; Gordon L Warren; Robert E Guldberg; Laxminarayanan Krishnan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  A Macro-to-Micro Interface for the Control of Cellular Organization.

Authors:  Elliot E Hui; Chun Li; Amit Agrawal; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  J Microelectromech Syst       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.417

Review 7.  Myocyte-fibroblast communication in cardiac fibrosis and arrhythmias: Mechanisms and model systems.

Authors:  Jason Pellman; Jing Zhang; Farah Sheikh
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 8.  Targeting IRES-dependent translation as a novel approach for treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Christine Péladeau; Bernard J Jasmin
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  Myocardial matrix-polyethylene glycol hybrid hydrogels for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gregory N Grover; Nikhil Rao; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.874

10.  Improved tissue culture conditions for engineered skeletal muscle sheets.

Authors:  Sara Hinds; Natalia Tyhovych; Clint Sistrunk; Louis Terracio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.