Literature DB >> 9707323

Heterogeneity among muscle precursor cells in adult skeletal muscles with differing regenerative capacities.

G K Pavlath1, D Thaloor, T A Rando, M Cheong, A W English, B Zheng.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle has a remarkable capacity to regenerate after injury, although studies of muscle regeneration have heretofore been limited almost exclusively to limb musculature. Muscle precursor cells in skeletal muscle are responsible for the repair of damaged muscle. Heterogeneity exists in the growth and differentiation properties of muscle precursor cell (myoblast) populations throughout limb development but whether the muscle precursor cells differ among adult skeletal muscles is unknown. Such heterogeneity among myoblasts in the adult may give rise to skeletal muscles with different regenerative capacities. Here we compare the regenerative response of a masticatory muscle, the masseter, to that of limb muscles. After exogenous trauma (freeze or crush injuries), masseter muscle regenerated much less effectively than limb muscle. In limb muscle, normal architecture was restored 12 days after injury, whereas in masseter muscle, minimal regeneration occurred during the same time period. Indeed, at late time points, masseter muscles exhibited increased fibrous connective tissue in the region of damage, evidence of ineffective muscle regeneration. Similarly, in response to endogenous muscle injury due to a muscular dystrophy, widespread evidence of impaired regeneration was present in masseter muscle but not in limb muscle. To explore the cellular basis of these different regenerative capacities, we analyzed the myoblast populations of limb and masseter muscles both in vivo and in vitro. From in vivo analyses, the number of myoblasts in regenerating muscle was less in masseter compared with limb muscle. Assessment of population growth in vitro indicated that masseter myoblasts grow more slowly than limb myoblasts under identical conditions. We conclude that the impaired regeneration in masseter muscles is due to differences in the intrinsic myoblast populations compared to limb muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9707323     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199808)212:4<495::AID-AJA3>3.0.CO;2-C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  51 in total

Review 1.  The origin and fate of muscle satellite cells.

Authors:  Arif Aziz; Soji Sebastian; F Jeffrey Dilworth
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Are human and mouse satellite cells really the same?

Authors:  Luisa Boldrin; Francesco Muntoni; Jennifer E Morgan
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Assessment of cell proliferation and muscular structure following surgical tongue volume reduction in pigs.

Authors:  W Ye; A F Abu; Z J Liu
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 4.  Reflections on lineage potential of skeletal muscle satellite cells: do they sometimes go MAD?

Authors:  Gabi Shefer; Zipora Yablonka-Reuveni
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.807

5.  Matrix metalloprotease-3 and tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease-1 mRNA and protein levels are altered in response to traumatic skeletal muscle injury.

Authors:  Maria L Urso; Eric R Szelenyi; Gordon L Warren; Brian R Barnes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  A clinically relevant animal model of temporomandibular disorder and irritable bowel syndrome comorbidity.

Authors:  Richard J Traub; Dong-Yuan Cao; Jane Karpowicz; Sangeeta Pandya; Yaping Ji; Susan G Dorsey; Dean Dessem
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Pharyngeal Satellite Cells Undergo Myogenesis Under Basal Conditions and Are Required for Pharyngeal Muscle Maintenance.

Authors:  Matthew E Randolph; Brittany L Phillips; Hyo-Jung Choo; Katherine E Vest; Yandery Vera; Grace K Pavlath
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Mechanisms of skeletal muscle injury and repair revealed by gene expression studies in mouse models.

Authors:  Gordon L Warren; Mukesh Summan; Xin Gao; Rebecca Chapman; Tracy Hulderman; Petia P Simeonova
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Other model organisms for sarcomeric muscle diseases.

Authors:  John Sparrow; Simon M Hughes; Laurent Segalat
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Muscle satellite cells are a functionally heterogeneous population in both somite-derived and branchiomeric muscles.

Authors:  Yusuke Ono; Luisa Boldrin; Paul Knopp; Jennifer E Morgan; Peter S Zammit
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.