Literature DB >> 22983439

Visual flight control in naturalistic and artificial environments.

Emily Baird1, Marie Dacke.   

Abstract

Although the visual flight control strategies of flying insects have evolved to cope with the complexity of the natural world, studies investigating this behaviour have typically been performed indoors using simplified two-dimensional artificial visual stimuli. How well do the results from these studies reflect the natural behaviour of flying insects considering the radical differences in contrast, spatial composition, colour and dimensionality between these visual environments? Here, we aim to answer this question by investigating the effect of three- and two-dimensional naturalistic and artificial scenes on bumblebee flight control in an outdoor setting and compare the results with those of similar experiments performed in an indoor setting. In particular, we focus on investigating the effect of axial (front-to-back) visual motion cues on ground speed and centring behaviour. Our results suggest that, in general, ground speed control and centring behaviour in bumblebees is not affected by whether the visual scene is two- or three dimensional, naturalistic or artificial, or whether the experiment is conducted indoors or outdoors. The only effect that we observe between naturalistic and artificial scenes on flight control is that when the visual scene is three-dimensional and the visual information on the floor is minimised, bumblebees fly further from the midline of the tunnel. The findings presented here have implications not only for understanding the mechanisms of visual flight control in bumblebees, but also for the results of past and future investigations into visually guided flight control in other insects.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22983439     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0757-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  14 in total

1.  Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators.

Authors:  R O Dror; D C O'Carroll; S B Laughlin
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 2.  How do visual neurons respond in the real world?

Authors:  P Reinagel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Neural coding of naturalistic motion stimuli.

Authors:  G D Lewen; W Bialek; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

4.  Amplitude spectra of natural images.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; Y Tadmor; T Chao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Minimum viewing angle for visually guided ground speed control in bumblebees.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Torill Kornfeldt; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  The spatial frequency tuning of optic-flow-dependent behaviors in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens.

Authors:  Jonathan P Dyhr; Charles M Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Contrast sensitivity of insect motion detectors to natural images.

Authors:  Andrew D Straw; Tamath Rainsford; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; M Lehrer; W H Kirchner; S W Zhang
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Nocturnal insects use optic flow for flight control.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Eva Kreiss; William Wcislo; Eric Warrant; Marie Dacke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Visual control of flight speed in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Steven N Fry; Nicola Rohrseitz; Andrew D Straw; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bumblebee flight performance in environments of different proximity.

Authors:  Nellie Linander; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Hummingbirds control hovering flight by stabilizing visual motion.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Bumblebees display characteristics of active vision during robust obstacle avoidance flight.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Tim Siesenop; Olivier J Bertrand; Liang Li; Charlotte Doussot; Alex Fisher; William H Warren; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  High contrast sensitivity for visually guided flight control in bumblebees.

Authors:  Aravin Chakravarthi; Almut Kelber; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The role of optic flow pooling in insect flight control in cluttered environments.

Authors:  Julien Lecoeur; Marie Dacke; Dario Floreano; Emily Baird
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Dynamic Echo Information Guides Flight in the Big Brown Bat.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; Wu-Jung Lee; Anand Krishnan; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 8.  Ecological Entomology: How Is Gibson's Framework Useful?

Authors:  Aimie Berger Dauxère; Julien R Serres; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Wind and route choice affect performance of bees flying above versus within a cluttered obstacle field.

Authors:  Nicholas P Burnett; Marc A Badger; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.