Literature DB >> 22982183

Similar efficacies of biliary, with or without pancreatic, sphincterotomy in treatment of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis.

Gregory A Coté1, Thomas F Imperiale, Suzette E Schmidt, Evan Fogel, Glen Lehman, Lee McHenry, James Watkins, Stuart Sherman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The role of sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) in the management of patients with idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis requires clarification. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis and the prognostic significance of pancreatic sphincter dysfunction (SOD).
METHODS: We performed a randomized trial of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with SOM for patients with idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis. Patients with pancreatic SOD (n = 69) were assigned randomly to groups that received only biliary sphincterotomy (BES) or a combination of biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy (DES); patients who underwent normal SOM (n = 20) were assigned randomly to groups that received BES or a sham surgery. The primary outcome was incidence of recurrent acute pancreatitis during the follow-up period (minimum, 1 year; maximum, 10 years). We also determined the incidence of chronic pancreatitis and analyzed factors associated with recurrence of acute pancreatitis.
RESULTS: Among the 69 patients with SOD, 48.5% who received BES and 47.2% who received DES had recurrent acute pancreatitis (95% confidence interval, -22.3 to 24.9; P = 1.0). In patients with normal SOM (n = 20), 27.3% of those who received BES and 11.1% of those who received the sham surgery had recurrent acute pancreatitis (95% confidence interval, -49.5 to 17.2; P = .59). Overall, 16.9% of subjects developed chronic pancreatitis during a median follow-up period of 78 months (interquartile range, 35-108 mo). The odds of recurrent acute pancreatitis during follow-up evaluation were significantly greater among patients with SOD than those with normal SOM (unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-11.4; P < .04), and remained so after adjusting for potential confounders (hazard ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-14.5; P < .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with pancreatic SOD, DES and BES have similar effects in preventing recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic SOD is an independent prognostic factor, identifying patients at higher risk for recurrent acute pancreatitis. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01583517).
Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22982183     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  24 in total

1.  Updates in Pediatric Pancreatology: Proceedings of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Frontiers in Pediatric Pancreatology Symposium.

Authors:  Amit S Grover; Alvin J Freeman; Maisam Abu-El-Haija; John F Eisses; Timothy B Gardner; Quin Y Liu; Mark E Lowe; Jaimie D Nathan; Tonya M Palermo; Vikesh K Singh; Andrew T Trout; Aliye Uc; Sohail Z Husain; Veronique D Morinville
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.839

2.  An Evaluation of Factors Associated With Pathogenic PRSS1, SPINK1, CTFR, and/or CTRC Genetic Variants in Patients With Idiopathic Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Niloofar Y Jalaly; Robert A Moran; Farshid Fargahi; Mouen A Khashab; Ayesha Kamal; Anne Marie Lennon; Christi Walsh; Martin A Makary; David C Whitcomb; Dhiraj Yadav; Liudmila Cebotaru; Vikesh K Singh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Evaluating Adults With Idiopathic Pancreatitis for Genetic Predisposition: Higher Prevalence of Abnormal Results With Use of Complete Gene Sequencing.

Authors:  Darren D Ballard; Joyce R Flueckiger; Evan L Fogel; Lee McHenry; Glen A Lehman; James L Watkins; Stuart Sherman; Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Impact of a clinical pathway on treatment outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Miroslav Vujasinovic; Jana Makuc; Bojan Tepes; Apolon Marolt; Zdenko Kikec; Nace Robac
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Functional Pancreatic Sphincter Dysfunction in Children: Recommendations for Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Tom K Lin; Douglas S Fishman; Matthew J Giefer; Quin Y Liu; David Troendle; Steven Werlin; Mark E Lowe; Aliye Uc
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.839

6.  Prospective Endoscopic Ultrasound-Based Approach to the Evaluation of Idiopathic Pancreatitis: Causes, Response to Therapy, and Long-term Outcome.

Authors:  C Mel Wilcox; Toni Seay; Hwasoon Kim; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction: Updates from the Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mohammad Yaghoobi; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Idiopathic acute pancreatitis: a review on etiology and diagnostic work-up.

Authors:  Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Cristina Gesuale; Marzia Varanese; Giovanni Monteleone; Omero Alessandro Paoluzi
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04-30

Review 9.  Acute recurrent pancreatitis: Etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Pier Alberto Testoni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Epidemiology of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Similarities and Differences.

Authors:  Jorge D Machicado; Dhiraj Yadav
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.