M Dieterich1, T Reimer, H Dieterich, J Stubert, B Gerber. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University of Rostock, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Suedring 81, 18059 Rostock, Germany. max.dieterich@uni-rostock.de
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A new approach for implant based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the use of a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TCPM) as an alternative to acellular dermal matrix (ADM). This TCPM has a good biocompatibility and can be used similarly to ADM. The aim of this study is to discuss indications, limitations and complications of TCPM in IBBR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 42 patients undergoing immediate or delayed IBBR using a TCPM was performed. Primary endpoints were incidence of infection and expander/implant with mesh removal due to infected fluid collection or extrusion. RESULTS: In two patients, mild hematoma, seroma or infection occurred. Skin necrosis or capsular contraction was observed in one patient. Mesh explantation was needed in 3 cases. These events were higher among the first cases and in patients with postoperative skin infection (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with adequate soft tissue cover TCPM seems to be a helpful tool for implant stabilization in terms of lateral stabilization and fixation of the musculus pectoralis major. In comparison to ADM, TCPM is cheaper and initial results are promising, but further follow-up data are necessary. In patients with poor soft tissue cover ADM should be used.
INTRODUCTION: A new approach for implant based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the use of a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TCPM) as an alternative to acellular dermal matrix (ADM). This TCPM has a good biocompatibility and can be used similarly to ADM. The aim of this study is to discuss indications, limitations and complications of TCPM in IBBR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 42 patients undergoing immediate or delayed IBBR using a TCPM was performed. Primary endpoints were incidence of infection and expander/implant with mesh removal due to infected fluid collection or extrusion. RESULTS: In two patients, mild hematoma, seroma or infection occurred. Skin necrosis or capsular contraction was observed in one patient. Mesh explantation was needed in 3 cases. These events were higher among the first cases and in patients with postoperative skin infection (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with adequate soft tissue cover TCPM seems to be a helpful tool for implant stabilization in terms of lateral stabilization and fixation of the musculus pectoralis major. In comparison to ADM, TCPM is cheaper and initial results are promising, but further follow-up data are necessary. In patients with poor soft tissue cover ADM should be used.
Authors: Shelley Potter; Elizabeth J Conroy; Paula R Williamson; Steven Thrush; Lisa J Whisker; Joanna M Skillman; Nicola L P Barnes; Ramsey I Cutress; Elizabeth M Teasdale; Nicola Mills; Senthurun Mylvaganam; Olivier A Branford; Katherina McEvoy; Abhilash Jain; Matthew D Gardiner; Jane M Blazeby; Christopher Holcombe Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2016-08-04
Authors: Senthurun Mylvaganam; Elizabeth Conroy; Paula R Williamson; Nicola L P Barnes; Ramsey I Cutress; Matthew D Gardiner; Abhilash Jain; Joanna M Skillman; Steven Thrush; Lisa J Whisker; Jane M Blazeby; Shelley Potter; Christopher Holcombe Journal: Breast Date: 2017-07-30 Impact factor: 4.380