OBJECTIVE: To determine whether endogenous sex hormones (estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)) are longitudinally associated with progression of atherosclerosis among women at midlife. METHODS: 249 Pre- or early peri-menopausal women (42-57 years) from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) were followed for up to 9 years (median = 3.7 years) and had up to 5 repeated measures of common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and adventitial diameter (AD). Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis. Final models included age at baseline, time since baseline, cycle day of blood draw, race, income, SBP, BMI, insulin resistance index, lipids, C-reactive protein and co-morbidity. RESULTS: In final models for IMT, each one log unit decrease in SHBG was associated with a 0.005 mm/year increase in IMT progression (P = 0.003). E2, T, and FSH were not associated with level or progression of IMT. For AD, each one log unit decrease in E2 was associated with a 0.012 mm/year increase in AD progression (P = 0.04) and each one log unit increase in FSH was associated with a 0.016 mm/year increase in AD progression (P = 0.003). T and SHBG were not associated with progression or level of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of SBP, BMI, lipids and other covariates, lower E2 and SHBG, and higher FSH were associated with increased subclinical atherosclerosis progression in women at midlife.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether endogenous sex hormones (estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)) are longitudinally associated with progression of atherosclerosis among women at midlife. METHODS: 249 Pre- or early peri-menopausal women (42-57 years) from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) were followed for up to 9 years (median = 3.7 years) and had up to 5 repeated measures of common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and adventitial diameter (AD). Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis. Final models included age at baseline, time since baseline, cycle day of blood draw, race, income, SBP, BMI, insulin resistance index, lipids, C-reactive protein and co-morbidity. RESULTS: In final models for IMT, each one log unit decrease in SHBG was associated with a 0.005 mm/year increase in IMT progression (P = 0.003). E2, T, and FSH were not associated with level or progression of IMT. For AD, each one log unit decrease in E2 was associated with a 0.012 mm/year increase in AD progression (P = 0.04) and each one log unit increase in FSH was associated with a 0.016 mm/year increase in AD progression (P = 0.003). T and SHBG were not associated with progression or level of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of SBP, BMI, lipids and other covariates, lower E2 and SHBG, and higher FSH were associated with increased subclinical atherosclerosis progression in women at midlife.
Authors: A Katsuki; Y Sumida; E C Gabazza; S Murashima; M Furuta; R Araki-Sasaki; Y Hori; Y Yano; Y Adachi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Rachel P Wildman; Karen Matthews; Rebecca C Thurston; Joyce T Bromberger; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett; J E Manson; B Rosner; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-09-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Bradley M Appelhans; Melissa D Latham; Michelle A Irving; Steven E Gregorich; Nancy E Adler; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Corinna Serviente; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Jyrki Virtanen; Sarah Witkowski; Leo Niskanen; Elizabeth Bertone-Johnson Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Irina W Neufeld; Anton R Kiselev; Antoly S Karavaev; Mikhail D Prokhorov; Vladimir I Gridnev; Vladimir I Ponomarenko; Boris P Bezruchko Journal: J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Date: 2015-03-01
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Nanette Santoro; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Ping G Tepper; Maria M Brooks; Rebecca C Thurston; Imke Janssen; Sioban D Harlow; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Faith Selzer; Carol A Derby; Elizabeth A Jackson; Daniel McConnell; Karen A Matthews Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Susan J Spieker; Steven E Gregorich; Alexis S Thomas; Robert A Hiatt; Bradley M Appelhans; Glenn I Roisman; Cathryn Booth-LaForce Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2021-01-20
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary; Ping Guo Tepper; Elizabeth A Jackson; Hadine Joffe; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Karen A Matthews Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Yamnia I Cortés; Nancy Reame; Cosmina Zeana; Haomiao Jia; David C Ferris; Elizabeth Shane; Michael T Yin Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 2.681