BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia in Gaucher disease includes reduced total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (C). No prospective analysis of lipid profile changes in treatment-naïve patients under enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is available. METHODS: We analyzed lipid profile changes during ERT in a prospective controlled manner. Twelve treatment-naïve patients, Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1), 29.5 ± 12.9 years, 4M/8F. Diagnosis was made by enzymatic measurement and mutational analysis. Total-, LDL-, and HDL-C, triglycerides (TG), and LDL subfractions were assessed before the start of ERT with imiglucerase and biannually for 3 years. Patients were matched with healthy controls before and after 3 years of ERT. RESULTS: At baseline, we found severely reduced HDL-C concentrations (23.6 ± 5.4 mg/dl) and enhanced LDL/HDL ratios (3.1 ± 0.7). HDL-C increased after 6 months (29.2 ± 5.7, p = 0.023), LDL/HDL ratio decreased after 30 months (2.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.039). TG, even not consistently enhanced at baseline (128 ± 31.3 mg/dl), yet higher than in controls (p < 0.001), decreased after 18 months, being comparable with controls after 3 years of ERT. Small, dense LDL (mg/dl) increased continuously without significant difference to controls. After 3 years of ERT, only reduced HDL-C concentrations persisted as a potentially atherogenic alteration; however, mean concentrations markedly improved (42.9 ± 8.3 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Lipid parameters correlated with six markers of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective controlled study regarding lipid profile dynamics during ERT (glucocerebrosidase) in initially treatment-naïve GD1 patients. The most important changes were reduced HDL-C and enhanced LDL/HDL ratio. Their dynamics during ERT and correlations with markers of disease activity suggest that they can be considered markers of disease severity and follow-up in Gaucher patients under treatment.
BACKGROUND:Dyslipidemia in Gaucher disease includes reduced total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (C). No prospective analysis of lipid profile changes in treatment-naïve patients under enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is available. METHODS: We analyzed lipid profile changes during ERT in a prospective controlled manner. Twelve treatment-naïve patients, Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1), 29.5 ± 12.9 years, 4M/8F. Diagnosis was made by enzymatic measurement and mutational analysis. Total-, LDL-, and HDL-C, triglycerides (TG), and LDL subfractions were assessed before the start of ERT with imiglucerase and biannually for 3 years. Patients were matched with healthy controls before and after 3 years of ERT. RESULTS: At baseline, we found severely reduced HDL-C concentrations (23.6 ± 5.4 mg/dl) and enhanced LDL/HDL ratios (3.1 ± 0.7). HDL-C increased after 6 months (29.2 ± 5.7, p = 0.023), LDL/HDL ratio decreased after 30 months (2.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.039). TG, even not consistently enhanced at baseline (128 ± 31.3 mg/dl), yet higher than in controls (p < 0.001), decreased after 18 months, being comparable with controls after 3 years of ERT. Small, dense LDL (mg/dl) increased continuously without significant difference to controls. After 3 years of ERT, only reduced HDL-C concentrations persisted as a potentially atherogenic alteration; however, mean concentrations markedly improved (42.9 ± 8.3 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Lipid parameters correlated with six markers of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective controlled study regarding lipid profile dynamics during ERT (glucocerebrosidase) in initially treatment-naïve GD1 patients. The most important changes were reduced HDL-C and enhanced LDL/HDL ratio. Their dynamics during ERT and correlations with markers of disease activity suggest that they can be considered markers of disease severity and follow-up in Gaucher patients under treatment.
Authors: R A Barneveld; W Keijzer; F P Tegelaers; E I Ginns; A Geurts van Kessel; R O Brady; J A Barranger; J M Tager; H Galjaard; A Westerveld; A J Reuser Journal: Hum Genet Date: 1983 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: M Pocovi; A Cenarro; F Civeira; M A Torralba; J I Perez-Calvo; P Mozas; P Giraldo; M Giralt; R H Myers; L A Cupples; J M Ordovas Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-06-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Melissa P Wasserstein; Simon A Jones; Handrean Soran; George A Diaz; Natalie Lippa; Beth L Thurberg; Kerry Culm-Merdek; Elias Shamiyeh; Haig Inguilizian; Gerald F Cox; Ana Cristina Puga Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 4.797