Literature DB >> 15175353

In vivo metabolism of LDL subfractions in patients with heterozygous FH on statin therapy: rebound analysis of LDL subfractions after LDL apheresis.

H C Geiss1, S Bremer, P H R Barrett, C Otto, K G Parhofer.   

Abstract

LDL can be subfractionated into buoyant (1.020-1.029 g/ml(-1)), intermediate (1.030-1.040 g/ml(-1)), and dense (1.041-1.066 g/ml(-1)) LDLs. We studied the rebound of these LDL-subfractions after LDL apheresis in seven patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) regularly treated by apheresis (58 +/- 9 years, LDL-cholesterol = 342 +/- 87 mg/dl(-1), triglycerides = 109 +/- 39 mg/dl(-1)) and high-dose statins. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) concentrations were measured in LDL subfractions immediately after and on days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 after apheresis. Compartmental models were developed to test three hypotheses: 1) that dense LDLs are derived from the delipidation of buoyant and intermediate LDLs (model A); 2) that dense LDLs are generated directly from LDL-precursors (model B); or 3) that a model combining both pathways (model C) is necessary to describe the metabolism of dense LDLs. In all models, it was assumed that apoB production and fractional catabolic rate (FCR) did not change with apheresis. Apheresis decreased buoyant, intermediate, and dense LDL-apoB by 60 +/- 12%, 67 +/- 5%, and 69 +/- 11%, respectively. Models B and C, but not model A, described the rebound data. The model with the greatest biological plausibility (model C) was used to estimate metabolic parameters. FCR was 1.05 +/- 0.86 d(-1), 0.48 +/- 0.11 d(-1), and 0.69 +/- 0.24 d(-1) for buoyant, intermediate, and dense LDLs, respectively. Dense LDL production was 17.3 +/- 0.2 mg/kg(-1)/d(-1), 58% of which was derived directly from LDL precursors (VLDL, IDL, or direct secretion), while 42% was derived from buoyant and intermediate LDLs. Thus, our data indicate that in statin-treated patients with heterozygous FH dense LDLs originate from two sources. Whether this is also valid in other metabolic situations (with predominant small, dense LDLs) remains to be determined. Copyright 2004 American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175353     DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M300523-JLR200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lipid Res        ISSN: 0022-2275            Impact factor:   5.922


  7 in total

1.  Dynamic changes of lipid profile in Romanian patients with Gaucher disease type 1 under enzyme replacement therapy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Anca Zimmermann; Paula Grigorescu-Sido; Heidi Rossmann; Karl J Lackner; Cristina Drugan; Camelia Al Khzouz; Simona Bucerzan; Ioana Naşcu; Tim Zimmermann; Daniel Leucuţa; Matthias M Weber
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Prevalence of plasma small dense LDL is increased in obesity in a Thai population.

Authors:  Sirikul Kulanuwat; Rungsunn Tungtrongchitr; David Billington; Ian G Davies
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 3.  Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein as Biomarker for Atherosclerotic Diseases.

Authors:  Ekaterina A Ivanova; Veronika A Myasoedova; Alexandra A Melnichenko; Andrey V Grechko; Alexander N Orekhov
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2017-05-07       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 4.  Current Role of Lipoprotein Apheresis.

Authors:  Gilbert Thompson; Klaus G Parhofer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Association of small, dense LDL-cholesterol concentration and lipoprotein particle characteristics with coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lathan Liou; Stephen Kaptoge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  LDL retention time in plasma can be -based on causation- estimated by the lipid composition of LDL and other lipoproteins.

Authors:  Martin Jansen; Christine Contini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Impact of selective LDL apheresis on serum chemerin levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Viktória E Varga; Hajnalka Lőrincz; Noémi Zsíros; Péter Fülöp; Ildikó Seres; György Paragh; József Balla; Mariann Harangi
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.