Literature DB >> 22976663

Computer-assisted navigational surgery improves outcomes in orbital reconstructive surgery.

Elijah Zhengyang Cai1, Yun Pei Koh, Eileen Chor Hoong Hing, Jin Rong Low, Jia Yi Shen, Hung Chew Wong, Gangadhara Sundar, Thiam Chye Lim.   

Abstract

Orbital reconstruction is a difficult procedure, success of which is dependent on the surgeon's experience. The lack of objective methods requires a fair amount of estimation is its execution. This study evaluates the efficacy of Kolibri (BrainLab, Munich, Germany), an intraoperative navigation device, in improving outcomes. From 2004 to 2009, 58 patients with orbital trauma who underwent surgery at the National University Hospital, Singapore, were included in this prospective matched control trial. Twenty-nine consecutive patients underwent surgery with Kolibri. The control group underwent surgery without the device. Both groups were matched for age, sex, orbital wall fracture, preoperative ophthalmologic features, etiology and severity of trauma, surgical approach, and types of implant used. The postoperative follow-up was at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. For subjective assessment, the postoperative ophthalmologic features, including diplopia, infraorbital hypoesthesia, ophthalmoplegia, and enophthalmos, were compared. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, there were fewer patients with postoperative ophthalmologic complications in the study group (italicized; n = 29) compared with the control group (n = 29; P < 0.05): 12/29 (41%) versus 21/29 (72%), 8/29 (28%) versus 19/29 (66%), 5/29 (17%) versus 15/29 (52%), and 2/29 (7%) versus 12/29 (41%). For objective assessment, using the Kolibri workstation, operative plans were created and fused with postoperative computed tomographic scans. Vertical distances between the actual reconstructed and planned orbital floors were measured. On average, the vertical distance measured from the boundaries of floor defects for patients in the study group was 3.24 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.56-4.91) lower than the control group (P = 0.001). In conclusion, navigation minimizes postoperative complications, reduces the need for repeat procedures, and helps surgeons with planning, execution, and postoperative assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22976663     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318260ef33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  7 in total

Review 1.  Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Shivam Patel; Tom Shokri; Kasra Ziai; Jessyka G Lighthall
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-24

2.  A Protocol to Reduce Interobserver Variability in the Computed Tomography Measurement of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Chuan Han Ang; Jin Rong Low; Jia Yi Shen; Elijah Zheng Yang Cai; Eileen Chor Hoong Hing; Yiong Huak Chan; Gangadhara Sundar; Thiam Chye Lim
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 3.  The Role of Computer-Assisted Technology in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction: A PRISMA-driven Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kelvin H Wan; Kelvin K L Chong; Alvin L Young
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Precision of a Novel Craniofacial Surgical Navigation System Based on Augmented Reality Using an Occlusal Splint as a Registration Strategy.

Authors:  Taoran Jiang; Ming Zhu; Gang Chai; Qingfeng Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Computer-assisted navigation in orbitofacial surgery.

Authors:  Priti Udhay; Kasturi Bhattacharjee; P Ananthnarayanan; Gangadhar Sundar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Preliminary outcomes of the surgical navigation system combined with intraoperative three-dimensional C-arm computed tomography for zygomatico-orbital fracture reconstruction.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Chu; Jia-Ruei Yang; Bo-Ru Lai; Han-Tsung Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Quantitative Assessment of Orbital Implant Position--A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Ruud Schreurs; Leander Dubois; Alfred G Becking; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.