Sietske Romkema1, Raoul M Bongers, Corry K van der Sluis. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, NL-9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands. s.romkema@umcg.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Intermanual transfer may improve prosthetic handling and acceptance if used in training soon after an amputation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intermanual transfer effects can be detected after training with a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis simulator. DESIGN: A mechanistic, randomized, pretest-posttest design was used. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 48 right-handed participants (25 women, 23 men) who were able-bodied were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. INTERVENTION: The experimental group performed a training program of 5 days' duration using the prosthesis simulator. To determine the improvement in skill, a test was administered before, immediately after, and 6 days after training. The control group only performed the tests. Training was performed with the unaffected arm, and tests were performed with the affected arm (the affected arm simulating an amputated limb). Half of the participants were tested with the dominant arm and half with the nondominant arm. MEASUREMENTS: Initiation time was defined as the time from starting signal until start of the movement, movement time was defined as the time from the beginning of the movement until completion of the task, and force control was defined as the maximal applied force on a deformable object. RESULTS: The movement time decreased significantly more in the experimental group (F₂,₉₂=7.42, P=.001, η²(G)=.028) when compared with the control group. This finding is indicative of faster handling of the prosthesis. No statistically significant differences were found between groups with regard to initiation time and force control. We did not find a difference in intermanual transfer between the dominant and nondominant arms. LIMITATIONS: The training utilized participants who were able-bodied in a laboratory setting and focused only on transradial amputations. CONCLUSIONS:Intermanual transfer was present in the affected arm after training the unaffected arm with a myoelectric prosthesis simulator, and this effect did not depend on laterality. This effect may improve rehabilitation of patients with an upper-limb amputation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Intermanual transfer may improve prosthetic handling and acceptance if used in training soon after an amputation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intermanual transfer effects can be detected after training with a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis simulator. DESIGN: A mechanistic, randomized, pretest-posttest design was used. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 48 right-handed participants (25 women, 23 men) who were able-bodied were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. INTERVENTION: The experimental group performed a training program of 5 days' duration using the prosthesis simulator. To determine the improvement in skill, a test was administered before, immediately after, and 6 days after training. The control group only performed the tests. Training was performed with the unaffected arm, and tests were performed with the affected arm (the affected arm simulating an amputated limb). Half of the participants were tested with the dominant arm and half with the nondominant arm. MEASUREMENTS: Initiation time was defined as the time from starting signal until start of the movement, movement time was defined as the time from the beginning of the movement until completion of the task, and force control was defined as the maximal applied force on a deformable object. RESULTS: The movement time decreased significantly more in the experimental group (F₂,₉₂=7.42, P=.001, η²(G)=.028) when compared with the control group. This finding is indicative of faster handling of the prosthesis. No statistically significant differences were found between groups with regard to initiation time and force control. We did not find a difference in intermanual transfer between the dominant and nondominant arms. LIMITATIONS: The training utilized participants who were able-bodied in a laboratory setting and focused only on transradial amputations. CONCLUSIONS: Intermanual transfer was present in the affected arm after training the unaffected arm with a myoelectric prosthesis simulator, and this effect did not depend on laterality. This effect may improve rehabilitation of patients with an upper-limb amputation.
Authors: Ecaterina Vasluian; Ingrid G M de Jong; Wim G M Janssen; Margriet J Poelma; Iris van Wijk; Heleen A Reinders-Messelink; Corry K van der Sluis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 3.240