Literature DB >> 22976035

Identification of motions in membrane proteins by elastic network models and their experimental validation.

Basak Isin1, Kalyan C Tirupula, Zoltán N Oltvai, Judith Klein-Seetharaman, Ivet Bahar.   

Abstract

Identifying the functional motions of membrane proteins is difficult because they range from large-scale collective dynamics to local small atomic fluctuations at different timescales that are difficult to measure experimentally due to the hydrophobic nature of these proteins. Elastic Network Models, and in particular their most widely used implementation, the Anisotropic Network Model (ANM), have proven to be useful computational methods in many recent applications to predict membrane protein dynamics. These models are based on the premise that biomolecules possess intrinsic mechanical characteristics uniquely defined by their particular architectures. In the ANM, interactions between residues in close proximity are represented by harmonic potentials with a uniform spring constant. The slow mode shapes generated by the ANM provide valuable information on the global dynamics of biomolecules that are relevant to their function. In its recent extension in the form of ANM-guided molecular dynamics (MD), this coarse-grained approach is augmented with atomic detail. The results from ANM and its extensions can be used to guide experiments and thus speedup the process of quantifying motions in membrane proteins. Testing the predictions can be accomplished through (a) direct observation of motions through studies of structure and biophysical probes, (b) perturbation of the motions by, e.g., cross-linking or site-directed mutagenesis, and (c) by studying the effects of such perturbations on protein function, typically through ligand binding and activity assays. To illustrate the applicability of the combined computational ANM-experimental testing framework to membrane proteins, we describe-alongside the general protocols-here the application of ANM to rhodopsin, a prototypical member of the pharmacologically relevant G-protein coupled receptor family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22976035      PMCID: PMC4801040          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-023-6_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  102 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Structure and function in rhodopsin: Mass spectrometric identification of the abnormal intradiscal disulfide bond in misfolded retinitis pigmentosa mutants.

Authors:  J Hwa; J Klein-Seetharaman; H G Khorana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Concerted interconversion between ionic lock substates of the beta(2) adrenergic receptor revealed by microsecond timescale molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Tod D Romo; Alan Grossfield; Michael C Pitman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  An efficient method for sampling the essential subspace of proteins.

Authors:  A Amadei; A B Linssen; B L de Groot; D M van Aalten; H J Berendsen
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1996-02

5.  Characterization of membrane protein non-native states. 1. Extent of unfolding and aggregation of rhodopsin in the presence of chemical denaturants.

Authors:  Arpana Dutta; Kalyan C Tirupula; Ulrike Alexiev; Judith Klein-Seetharaman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  The 2.0 A crystal structure of a heterotrimeric G protein.

Authors:  D G Lambright; J Sondek; A Bohm; N P Skiba; H E Hamm; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Further screening of the rhodopsin gene in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R Vaithinathan; E L Berson; T P Dryja
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Expression of a mutant opsin gene increases the susceptibility of the retina to light damage.

Authors:  M Wang; T T Lam; M O Tso; M I Naash
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 9.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function.

Authors:  Ivet Bahar; Timothy R Lezon; Lee-Wei Yang; Eran Eyal
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.981

10.  Preferential binding of allosteric modulators to active and inactive conformational states of metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Naveena Yanamala; Kalyan C Tirupula; Judith Klein-Seetharaman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins.

Authors:  Lidio Meireles; Mert Gur; Ahmet Bakan; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Dual function of mitochondrial Nm23-H4 protein in phosphotransfer and intermembrane lipid transfer: a cardiolipin-dependent switch.

Authors:  Uwe Schlattner; Malgorzata Tokarska-Schlattner; Sacnicte Ramirez; Yulia Y Tyurina; Andrew A Amoscato; Dariush Mohammadyani; Zhentai Huang; Jianfei Jiang; Naveena Yanamala; Amal Seffouh; Mathieu Boissan; Raquel F Epand; Richard M Epand; Judith Klein-Seetharaman; Marie-Lise Lacombe; Valerian E Kagan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Revealing an outward-facing open conformational state in a CLC Cl(-)/H(+) exchange transporter.

Authors:  Chandra M Khantwal; Sherwin J Abraham; Wei Han; Tao Jiang; Tanmay S Chavan; Ricky C Cheng; Shelley M Elvington; Corey W Liu; Irimpan I Mathews; Richard A Stein; Hassane S Mchaourab; Emad Tajkhorshid; Merritt Maduke
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  X-ray refinement significantly underestimates the level of microscopic heterogeneity in biomolecular crystals.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Navraj S Pannu; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Allosteric Communications between Domains Modulate the Activity of Matrix Metalloprotease-1.

Authors:  Lokender Kumar; Anthony Nash; Chase Harms; Joan Planas-Iglesias; Derek Wright; Judith Klein-Seetharaman; Susanta K Sarkar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Integrated Computational Approaches and Tools forAllosteric Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Olivier Sheik Amamuddy; Wayde Veldman; Colleen Manyumwa; Afrah Khairallah; Steve Agajanian; Odeyemi Oluyemi; Gennady Verkhivker; Ozlem Tastan Bishop
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.