Literature DB >> 22976010

Ecological constraints on female fitness in a phytophagous insect.

David Berger1, Martin Olofsson, Karl Gotthard, Christer Wiklund, Magne Friberg.   

Abstract

Although understanding female reproduction is crucial for population demography, determining how and to what relative extent it is constrained by different ecological factors is complicated by difficulties in studying the links between individual behavior, life history, and fitness in nature. We present data on females in a natural population of the butterfly Leptidea sinapis. These data were combined with climate records and laboratory estimates of life-history parameters to predict the relative impact of different ecological constraints on female fitness in the wild. Using simulation models, we partitioned effects of male courtship, host plant availability, and temperature on female fitness. Results of these models indicate that temperature is the most constraining factor on female fitness, followed by host plant availability; the short-term negative effects of male courtship that were detected in the field study were less important in models predicting female reproductive success over the entire life span. In the simulations, females with more reproductive reserves were more limited by the ecological variables. Reproductive physiology and egg-laying behavior were therefore predicted to be co-optimized but reach different optima for females of different body sizes; this prediction is supported by the empirical data. This study thus highlights the need for studying behavioral and life-history variation in orchestration to achieve a more complete picture of both demographic and evolutionary processes in naturally variable and unpredictable environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22976010     DOI: 10.1086/667594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

1.  Decoupling of female host plant preference and offspring performance in relative specialist and generalist butterflies.

Authors:  M Friberg; D Posledovich; C Wiklund
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Female fecundity variation affects reproducibility of experiments on host plant preference and acceptance in a phytophagous insect.

Authors:  Alexander Schäpers; Hampus Petrén; Christopher W Wheat; Christer Wiklund; Magne Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Floral resource limitation severely reduces butterfly survival, condition and flight activity in simplified agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Julie Lebeau; Renate A Wesselingh; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  What prolongs a butterfly's life?: Trade-offs between dormancy, fecundity and body size.

Authors:  Elena Haeler; Konrad Fiedler; Andrea Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Authors:  Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Emma Thilliez; Göran Arnqvist; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Innate preference hierarchies coupled with adult experience, rather than larval imprinting or transgenerational acclimation, determine host plant use in Pieris rapae.

Authors:  Hampus Petrén; Gabriele Gloder; Diana Posledovich; Christer Wiklund; Magne Friberg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Range expansion, habitat use, and choosiness in a butterfly under climate change: Marginality and tolerance of oviposition site selection.

Authors:  Youri Martin; Nicolas Titeux; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Egg load dynamics and the risk of egg and time limitation experienced by an aphid parasitoid in the field.

Authors:  Christine Dieckhoff; Julian C Theobald; Felix L Wäckers; George E Heimpel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.