Literature DB >> 26541442

Floral resource limitation severely reduces butterfly survival, condition and flight activity in simplified agricultural landscapes.

Julie Lebeau1, Renate A Wesselingh1, Hans Van Dyck2.   

Abstract

Agricultural intensification has a strong negative impact on farmland biodiversity (including flower-visiting insects), but understanding the mechanisms involved in this requires experimental work. We document the impact of nectar limitation on the performance of a flower-visiting insect, the meadow brown butterfly Maniola jurtina. We conducted two types of experiments: a field experiment in agricultural landscapes with grasslands of different management intensity and an experiment in outdoor flight cages in which the nectar supply was simulated. For the field experiment, we introduced an array of nectar resources in intensively managed, nectar-poor meadows and in extensively managed, flower-rich grasslands and counted flower visitors. Despite higher butterfly abundance in the extensive meadows, our introduced nectar sources were more frequently visited in intensive meadows, indicating the lack of floral resources. The 48-h confinement under nectar-poor conditions in the flight cages had a strong negative effect on body condition, flight activity and lifetime survival compared to butterflies under nectar-rich conditions. Female lifespan was reduced by 22% and male lifespan even by 43%. Agricultural landscapes that provide limited amounts of floral nectar, and no high-quality, preferred nectar sources relative to the needs of the flower-visiting species, may create ecological sinks. Regards an insect's performance, the simple presence of nectar is not necessarily functionally adequate. The effectiveness of agri-environmental schemes for flower-visiting insects (e.g. flower strips) could be improved based on ecological and evolutionary insights on the effects of specific nectar quantities and qualities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Life history; Lipids; Longevity; Mobility; Nectar

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26541442     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3492-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Enhancing offspring quality or quantity? Different ways for using nectar amino acids in female butterflies.

Authors:  Fabian Cahenzli; Andreas Erhardt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands.

Authors:  J C Biesmeijer; S P M Roberts; M Reemer; R Ohlemüller; M Edwards; T Peeters; A P Schaffers; S G Potts; R Kleukers; C D Thomas; J Settele; W E Kunin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture.

Authors:  S J Butler; J A Vickery; K Norris
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes.

Authors:  Sara J Scherr; Jeffrey A McNeely
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The quantitative study of populations in the Lepidoptera; Maniola jurtina L.

Authors:  W H DOWDESWELL; R W FISHER; E B FORD
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1949-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeroen Scheper; Andrea Holzschuh; Mikko Kuussaari; Simon G Potts; Maj Rundlöf; Henrik G Smith; David Kleijn
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Linking nectar amino acids to fitness in female butterflies.

Authors:  Mark A Jervis; Carol L Boggs
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Renewable and nonrenewable resources: amino acid turnover and allocation to reproduction in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Diane M O'Brien; Marilyn L Fogel; Carol L Boggs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Adult nutrition and butterfly fitness: effects of diet quality on reproductive output, egg composition, and egg hatching success.

Authors:  Thorin L Geister; Matthias W Lorenz; Klaus H Hoffmann; Klaus Fischer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Butterfly Density and Behaviour in Uncut Hay Meadow Strips: Behavioural Ecological Consequences of an Agri-Environmental Scheme.

Authors:  Julie Lebeau; Renate A Wesselingh; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nectar resource limitation affects butterfly flight performance and metabolism differently in intensive and extensive agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Julie Lebeau; Renate A Wesselingh; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) as a resource for farmland insect pollinators: quantifying floral traits in conventional varieties and breeding systems.

Authors:  Jonathan M Carruthers; Samantha M Cook; Geraldine A Wright; Juliet L Osborne; Suzanne J Clark; Jennifer L Swain; Alison J Haughton
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.745

3.  The importance of including habitat-specific behaviour in models of butterfly movement.

Authors:  Luke C Evans; Richard M Sibly; Pernille Thorbek; Ian Sims; Tom H Oliver; Richard J Walters
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Butterfly richness and abundance in flower strips and field margins: the role of local habitat quality and landscape context.

Authors:  Nana Wix; Michael Reich; Frank Schaarschmidt
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.