Literature DB >> 22975463

Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.

Joel A Bauman1, Nicolas V Jaumard, Benjamin B Guarino, Christine L Weisshaar, Daniel E Lipschutz, William C Welch, Beth A Winkelstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Total disc arthroplasty is a motion-preserving spinal procedure that has been investigated for its impact on spinal motions and adjacent-level degeneration. However, the effects of disc arthroplasty on facet joint biomechanics remain undefined despite the critical role of these posterior elements on guiding and limiting spinal motion.
PURPOSE: The goal was to measure the pressure in the facet joint in cadaveric human cervical spines subjected to sagittal bending before and after implantation of the ProDisc-C (Synthes Spine Company, L.P, West Chester, PA, USA). STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study was performed using cadaveric human cervical spines during sagittal bending in the intact and implanted conditions.
METHODS: Seven C2-T1 osteoligamentous cadaveric cervical spines were instrumented with a transducer to measure the C5-C6 facet pressure profiles during physiological sagittal bending, before and after implantation of a ProDisc-C at that level. Rotations of the index segment and global cervical spine were also quantified.
RESULTS: The mean C5-C6 range of motion significantly increased (p=.009) from 9.6°±5.1° in the intact condition to 16.2°±3.6° after implantation. However, despite such changes in rotation, there was no significant difference in the facet contact pressure during extension between the intact (64±30 kPa) and implanted (44±55 kPa) conditions. Similarly, there was no difference in facet pressure developed during flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: Although implantation of a ProDisc-C arthroplasty device at the C5-C6 level increases angular rotations, it does not significantly alter the local facet pressure at the index level in flexion or extension. Using a technique that preserves the capsular ligament, this study provides the first direct measurement of cervical facet pressure in a disc arthroplasty condition.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22975463     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  5 in total

1.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue.

Authors:  Zhong Jun Mo; Yan Bin Zhao; Li Zhen Wang; Yu Sun; Ming Zhang; Yu Bo Fan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Load rate of facet joints at the adjacent segment increased after fusion.

Authors:  Hui Li; Bao-Qing Pei; Jin-Cai Yang; Yong Hai; De-Yu Li; Shu-Qin Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Analysis of Correlation Between Age and Cervical Facet Joint Degeneration and Modic Changes in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Bin Lv; Xiaochen Fan; Hua Ding; Peng Ji; Yilei Zhao; Bowen Wan; Qinyi Jiang; Yongjun Luo; Tao Xu; Zhimin Zhou; Jian Chen; Jishan Yuan; Lei Wang; Anquan Huang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-10-21

5.  Effect of facet joint distraction on the functional and radiological outcomes after anterior cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Chunyi Yan; Hong Wang; Tingkui Wu; Chengyi Huang; Haimiti Abuduaini; Beiyu Wang; Hao Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.