Literature DB >> 2297428

Detectability as a function of target location: effects of spatial configuration.

R Efron1, E W Yund, D R Nichols.   

Abstract

Marked differences in detectability as a function of spatial location, a "detectability gradient," are observed when subjects are required to detect a briefly exposed target pattern of uncertain location in the presence of a number of nontarget patterns. Target detectability also is inversely related to the number of nontarget patterns which are present in this search paradigm. These previous findings provide strong evidence for a serial process in which increasing probability of error occurs during a scan of a rapidly degrading neural representation of the visual image following a brief exposure to the stimuli. It is not yet established whether this scan is attentional or perceptual in nature. The present experiments test the hypothesis of an attentional scan by presenting the target and nontarget patterns in spatially segregated groups. If the scan is attentional, then target detectability under these circumstances would be expected to exhibit the characteristic phenomenon of "group processing"--a close clustering of detection performance for targets located within a group and large differences in detectability across groups. As no evidence for group processing was observed, the results fail to support the view that the scan is attentional in nature but are fully consistent with a nonattentional scan.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2297428     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90007-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  4 in total

1.  Magnitude of sex differences in visual search varies with target eccentricity.

Authors:  Michael C W English; Murray T Maybery; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

2.  Representational momentum reveals visual anticipation differences in the upper and lower visual fields.

Authors:  Victoria M Gottwald; Gavin P Lawrence; Amy E Hayes; Michael A Khan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The eccentricity effect: target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches.

Authors:  M Carrasco; D L Evert; I Chang; S M Katz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

4.  Asymmetries in Distractibility: Left Distractors Improve Reaction Time Performance.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.