| Literature DB >> 22973443 |
Megan Landes1, Monique van Lettow, Richard Bedell, Isabell Mayuni, Adrienne K Chan, Lyson Tenthani, Erik Schouten.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected women is a global concern. This study compared mortality and health outcomes of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected mothers at 18-20 months postpartum within routine prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) services in a rural district in Malawi.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22973443 PMCID: PMC3433431 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Maternal characteristics by HIV status at 18–20 months postpartum.
| HIV-infected (N = 173) | HIV-uninfected (N = 214) | p-value | ||
|
| 29.1 (SD 5.8) | 25.3 (SD 5.6) | <0.001 | |
|
| Married | 125 (72.3) | 183 (85.5) | <0.001 |
| Single | 12 (6.9) | 7 (3.3) | ||
| Divorced/Separated | 24 (13.9) | 24 (11.2) | ||
| Widowed | 7 (4.1) | 0 (0) | ||
| Unknown | 5 (2.9) | 0 (0) | ||
|
| 4 (IQR 1–7) | 2 (IQR 0–5) | <0.001 | |
|
| Husband | 120 (69.4) | 182 (85.0) | <0.0001 |
| Self | 39 (22.5) | 19 (8.9) | ||
| Other | 9 (5.2) | 13 (6.1) | ||
| Unknown | 5 (2.9) | 0 (0) | ||
|
| Poorest | 48 (27.8) | 48 (22.4) | 0.004 |
| 2 | 48 (27.8) | 57 (26.6) | ||
| 3 | 43 (24.9) | 44 (20.6) | ||
| Wealthiest | 29 (16.8) | 65 (30.4) | ||
| Unknown | 5 (2.9) | 0 (0) | ||
|
| On ART | 45 (26.0) | ||
| Not on ART (CD4>350) | 56 (32.3) | |||
| Not on ART (Never Staged and/orno CD4 count) | 72 (41.6) |
A composite variable derived from multiple responses (e.g. level of education, housing type, water source, household size, source of income and means of transport).
Health status of surviving mothers at 18–20 months postpartum by HIV status.
| HIV-infected(N = 173) | HIV-uninfected (N = 214) | RR | p-value | ||
|
| No | 139 (85.8) | 194 (90.7) | 0.409 | |
| Yes | 22 (13.6) | 19 (8.9) | |||
| Unknown | 1 (0.6) | 1(0.5) | |||
|
| Underweight (<18.5) | 23 (13.3) | 31 (14.5) | 0.094 | |
| Normal (18.5–24.9) | 120 (69.4) | 162 (75.7) | |||
| Overweight (>25) | 21 (12.1) | 18 (8.4) | |||
| Unknown | 9 (5.2) | 3 (1.4) | |||
|
| Excellent | 63 (38.9) | 130 (60.8) | 1 | 0.001 |
| Good | 61 (37.7) | 58 (27.1) | 2.2 (1.4–3.5) | ||
| Fair | 33 (20.4) | 26 (12.2) | 2.6 (1.4–4.8) | ||
| Poor | 5 (3.1) | 0 | – | ||
|
| Normal activity/work | 86 (53.1) | 179 (83.6) | 1 | 0.001 |
| Normal activity/work; minor signsand symptoms of disease | 53 (32.7) | 29 (13.6) | 3.8 (2.3–6.4) | ||
| Normal activity/work; major signsand symptoms of disease | 15 (9.3) | 5 (2.3) | 6.2 (2.2–17.7) | ||
| Unable to work; can performself-care | 2 (1.2) | 1 (0.5) | 4.2 (0.4–46.5) | ||
| Unable to work; needs occasionalassistance for self-care | 2 (1.2) | 0 | . | ||
| Unable to care for self; needsconsiderable assistance | 4 (2.5) | 0 | . | ||
| Unable to care for self; severelydisabled/total care | 0 | 0 | . |
Unadjusted for other variables.
Factors associated with poor perceived health status.
| Excellent Health(N = 193) | Less than ExcellentHealth (N = 183) | Unadjusted OR(95% CI) | Adjusted OR | p-value | ||
|
| Uninfected | 130 (67.4) | 84 (45.9) | 1.0 | 1.0 | . |
| Infected | 63 (32.6) | 99 (54.1) | 2.4 (1.6–3.7) | 2.3 (1.4–3.6) | 0.000 | |
|
| Low (<18.5) | 19 (9.8) | 35 (19.1) | 2.0 (1.1–3.7) | 2.1 (1.1–4.0) | 0.018 |
| Normal (18.5–24.9) | 147 (76.2) | 133 (72.7) | 1 | 1.0 | . | |
| High (>25.0) | 26 (13.5) | 13 (7.1) | 0.6 (0.3–1.1) | 0.5 (0.2–1.0) | 0.044 | |
|
| Poorest | 42 (21.8) | 51 (27.8) | 2.4 (1.3–4.2) | 2.0 (1.1–3.8) | 0.021 |
| 2 | 47 (24.4) | 56 (30.6) | 2.3 (1.3–4.1) | 1.8 (1.0–3.2) | 0.051 | |
| 3 | 42 (21.8) | 44 (24.0) | 2.0 (1.1–3.7) | 1.7 (0.9–3.1) | 0.139 | |
| Wealthiest | 62 (32.1) | 32 (17.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 | . | |
|
| 0–2 | 94 (48.7) | 69 (37.7) | 1 | 1.0 | . |
| 3–5 | 87 (45) | 92 (50.3) | 1.4 (0.9–2.2) | 1.5 (0.9–2.5) | 0.219 | |
| 6 or > | 12 (6) | 22 (12) | 2.5 (1.2–5.4) | 2.6 (1.0–6.7) | 0.047 |
Adjusted for all other variables in the table along with age and parity.