| Literature DB >> 22973313 |
Marcelo de Oliveira E Silva1, André Antonio Pelegrine, Alexandre Alves Pinheiro da Silva, Luiz Roberto Manhães Júnior, Rafael de Mello E Oliveira, Silvana Gaiba França, Antonio Carlos Aloise, Lydia Masako Ferreira.
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone healing after the usage of a scaffold enriched with bone marrow. Study Design. Ten rabbits were divided into 2 groups of 5 animals. Bilateral 12 mm diameter defects were created in the parietal bones. In control group Bio-Oss were inserted in both defects and, in experimental group, Bio-Oss enriched with autologous bone marrow were inserted in both defects. In these two groups, one of the calvarial defects was covered with Bio-Gide. The rabbits were sacrified 8 weeks after surgery and both CT and histomorphometric analysis were done. Results. The CT showed a lower remaining defect area in the experimental group covered with Bio-Gide when compared with control group, with and without Bio-Gide. The histomorphometrics showed no difference between groups regarding the non-vital mineralized tissue area. For vital mineralized tissue area, the experimental group covered with Bio-Gide obtained a higher percentage area when compared with control group, with and without Bio-Gide. For non-mineralized tissue area, the experimental group covered with Bio-Gide obtained a lower percentage area when compared with control group, with and without Bio-Gide. Conclusion. Both autologous bone marrow and membrane can contribute to the enhancement of bone healing.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22973313 PMCID: PMC3437679 DOI: 10.1155/2012/170520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomater ISSN: 1687-8787
Figure 1Xenograft (bovine origin) with small granules used in the study.
Figure 2Xenogenous (porcine origin) barrier membrane used in the study.
Figure 3Critical-size defects in the parietal bones made with a trephine bur. (a) Before removal and (b) after removal.
Figure 4Autologous bone marrow being aspirated from the shinbone of one rabbit.
Figure 5One of the parietal critical-size defects being protected with Bio-Gide membrane.
Figure 6CT view after the measurement of a residual defect area.
Figure 7Histological view of NVMT, VMT, and NMT in 100x magnification (Mallory trichrome).
Figure 8Tomographic analysis of the remaining bone defect area (in mm2).
Statistical comparisons between groups were significant. P values < 0.05 were marked (*).
| Groups |
|
|---|---|
| Control group without membrane versus control group with membrane | 0.17 |
| Control group without membrane versus experimental group without membrane | 0.15 |
| Control group without membrane versus experimental group with membrane | 0.03* |
| Control group with membrane versus experimental group without membrane | 0.11 |
| Control group with membrane versus experimental group with membrane | 0.04* |
| Experimental group without membrane versus experimental group with membrane | 0.04* |
Mean and standard deviation of the non-vital mineralized tissue (NVMT), vital mineralized tissue (VMT), and non-mineralized tissue (NMT), analyzed by histomorphometrics, in percentage (%). P values < 0.05 were marked (*).
|
Control group |
Control group |
Experimental group |
Experimental group |
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| NVMT | 13.64 | 2.34 | 13.35 | 3.13 | 15.31 | 5.22 | 20.29 | 4.17 | 5 | 0.21 |
| VMT | 6.31 | 1.29 | 12.78 | 5.9 | 12.44 | 7.08 | 21.16 | 3.76 | 5 | 0.04* |
| NMT | 81.41 | 3.25 | 67.95 | 7.03 | 72.16 | 3.27 | 58.54 | 3.58 | 5 | 0.01* |
Figure 9Histomorphometric analysis of the non-vital mineralized tissue (NVMT), vital mineralized tissue (VMT), and non-mineralized tissue (NMT) in percentage (%).