| Literature DB >> 22973235 |
Abstract
Over the last decade, mouse models have become a popular instrument for studying cardiac arrhythmias. This review assesses in which respects a mouse heart is a miniature human heart, a suitable model for studying mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias in humans and in which respects human and murine hearts differ. Section I considers the issue of scaling of mammalian cardiac (electro) physiology to body mass. Then, we summarize differences between mice and humans in cardiac activation (section II) and the currents underlying the action potential in the murine working myocardium (section III). Changes in cardiac electrophysiology in mouse models of heart disease are briefly outlined in section IV, while section V discusses technical considerations pertaining to recording cardiac electrical activity in mice. Finally, section VI offers general considerations on the influence of cardiac size on the mechanisms of tachy-arrhythmias.Entities:
Keywords: arrhythmias; atrial fibrillation; conduction; mouse; scaling; ventricular fibrillation
Year: 2012 PMID: 22973235 PMCID: PMC3433738 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00345
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Comparison of mouse and human (cardiac) physiology.
| Body mass (kg) | 58–85 | de la Grandmaison et al., | 0.015–0.043 | Sheng et al., |
| Lifespan (year) | 70–80 | Zhang and Zhang, | 2–2.5 | Speakman et al., |
| Basal metabolic rate (kJ/d) | 6279 | Johnstone et al., | 15.6 | Speakman et al., |
| Basal metabolic rate (O2 consumption L/(kg*h) | 0.9 | Janssen and Smits, | 0.8–3 | Desai et al., |
| Heart weight (g) | 261–366 | de la Grandmaison et al., | 0.12–0.17 | Muller et al., |
| Heart weight/body weight ratio (kg/kg) | 0.004–0.006 | de la Grandmaison et al., | 0.004–0.005 | Muller et al., |
| Stroke volume (mL) | 50–100 | Janssen and Smits, | 0.015–0.05 | Janssen and Smits, |
| Cardiac output (L/min) | 4–8 | Janssen and Smits, | 0.005–0.03 | Janssen and Smits, |
| Blood pressure (mean arterial pressure, mmHg) | 88–100 | Mancia et al., | 73–125 | Kass et al., |
| Blood volume (L) | 5–6 | Janssen and Smits, | 0.002–0.03 | Sheng et al., |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 56–101 | Edvardsson et al., | 500–724 | Kass et al., |
| PR interval (ms) | 120–200 | Stein et al., | 30–56 | Thomas et al., |
| QRS duration (ms) | 84–110 | Kasper et al., | 9–30 | Thomas et al., |
| QT (ms) | 385 | Rich et al., | 29–109 | Thomas et al., |
| QTc (ms) | 398–430 | Stein et al., | 30–124 | Gehrmann et al., |
| Atrial ERP (ms) | 172–245 | Chiamvimonvat et al., | 23–71 | Thomas et al., |
| Atrial CV (cm/s) | 88 | Hansson et al., | 30–60 | Thomas et al., |
| AV Wenckebach CL (ms) | 329–453 | Chiamvimonvat et al., | 66–133 | Thomas et al., |
| Ventricular ERP (ms) | 223–257 | Edvardsson et al., | 33–80 | Thomas et al., |
| Ventricular CV (cm/s) | 80 | de Bakker et al., | 30–60 | Thomas et al., |
Figure 1Comparison of the human and murine ECG, 2-s traces showing lead I. Inset shows a single complex from the mouse ECG (human ECG is patient 121 in the PTB database at www.physionet.org, mouse ECG courtesy of Dr. Ricardo Carnicer, Oxford University).
Figure 2Scaling of atrial electrophysiology to body mass. Upper panel: atrial action potentials in various species (Schotten et al., 2011). Middle row, left panel: atrial ERP as a function of body mass (mouse Verheule et al., 1999, rat Chang et al., 2002, rabbit Fedorov et al., 2007, dog Fareh et al., 1998, goat Blaauw et al., 2004, human Roberts-Thomson et al., 2009, horse Van Loon et al., 2002). Middle row, right panel: atrial CV as a function of body mass [mouse Leaf et al., 2008, rat Haugan et al., 2005, rabbit de Groot et al., 2003, dog Fareh et al., 1998, goat Verheule et al., 2010, human Hansson et al., 1998, horse (NA)]. Bottom row, left panel: wavelength (product of CV and ERP) as a function of body mass. Bottom row, right panel: ratio of atrial circumference to wavelength. The atrial circumference was calculated by taking the LA diameter and approximating the total circumference as 2*2*π*LA radius (mouse Blana et al., 2010, rat Boixel et al., 2003, rabbit Hirose et al., 2005, dog Stepien et al., 1998, goat Wijffels et al., 1997, human Monnig et al., 2005, horse Menzies-Gow et al., 2005). Interestingly, the number of reentrant waves that can fit on the atrial circumference does not scale strongly with the body mass.