OBJECTIVE: There is increasing interest in adding common genetic variants identified through genome wide association studies (GWAS) to breast cancer risk prediction models. First results from such models showed modest benefits in terms of risk discrimination. Heterogeneity of breast cancer as defined by hormone-receptor status has not been considered in this context. In this study we investigated the predictive capacity of 32 GWAS-detected common variants for breast cancer risk, alone and in combination with classical risk factors, and for tumours with different hormone receptor status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium, we analysed 6009 invasive breast cancer cases and 7827 matched controls of European ancestry, with data on classical breast cancer risk factors and 32 common gene variants identified through GWAS. Discriminatory ability with respect to breast cancer of specific hormone receptor-status was assessed with the age adjusted and cohort-adjusted concordance statistic (AUROC(a)). Absolute risk scores were calculated with external reference data. Integrated discrimination improvement was used to measure improvements in risk prediction. RESULTS: We found a small but steady increase in discriminatory ability with increasing numbers of genetic variants included in the model (difference in AUROC(a) going from 2.7% to 4%). Discriminatory ability for all models varied strongly by hormone receptor status. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Adding information on common polymorphisms provides small but statistically significant improvements in the quality of breast cancer risk prediction models. We consistently observed better performance for receptor-positive cases, but the gain in discriminatory quality is not sufficient for clinical application.
OBJECTIVE: There is increasing interest in adding common genetic variants identified through genome wide association studies (GWAS) to breast cancer risk prediction models. First results from such models showed modest benefits in terms of risk discrimination. Heterogeneity of breast cancer as defined by hormone-receptor status has not been considered in this context. In this study we investigated the predictive capacity of 32 GWAS-detected common variants for breast cancer risk, alone and in combination with classical risk factors, and for tumours with different hormone receptor status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium, we analysed 6009 invasive breast cancer cases and 7827 matched controls of European ancestry, with data on classical breast cancer risk factors and 32 common gene variants identified through GWAS. Discriminatory ability with respect to breast cancer of specific hormone receptor-status was assessed with the age adjusted and cohort-adjusted concordance statistic (AUROC(a)). Absolute risk scores were calculated with external reference data. Integrated discrimination improvement was used to measure improvements in risk prediction. RESULTS: We found a small but steady increase in discriminatory ability with increasing numbers of genetic variants included in the model (difference in AUROC(a) going from 2.7% to 4%). Discriminatory ability for all models varied strongly by hormone receptor status. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Adding information on common polymorphisms provides small but statistically significant improvements in the quality of breast cancer risk prediction models. We consistently observed better performance for receptor-positive cases, but the gain in discriminatory quality is not sufficient for clinical application.
Authors: E W Steyerberg; F E Harrell; G J Borsboom; M J Eijkemans; Y Vergouwe; J D Habbema Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Daniele Campa; Rudolf Kaaks; Loïc Le Marchand; Christopher A Haiman; Ruth C Travis; Christine D Berg; Julie E Buring; Stephen J Chanock; W Ryan Diver; Lucie Dostal; Agnes Fournier; Susan E Hankinson; Brian E Henderson; Robert N Hoover; Claudine Isaacs; Mattias Johansson; Laurence N Kolonel; Peter Kraft; I-Min Lee; Catherine A McCarty; Kim Overvad; Salvatore Panico; Petra H M Peeters; Elio Riboli; Maria José Sanchez; Fredrick R Schumacher; Guri Skeie; Daniel O Stram; Michael J Thun; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Shumin Zhang; Regina G Ziegler; David J Hunter; Sara Lindström; Federico Canzian Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Andrew N Freedman; Binbing Yu; Mitchell H Gail; Joseph P Costantino; Barry I Graubard; Victor G Vogel; Garnet L Anderson; Worta McCaskill-Stevens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R B Hayes; D Reding; W Kopp; A F Subar; N Bhat; N Rothman; N Caporaso; R G Ziegler; C C Johnson; J L Weissfeld; R N Hoover; P Hartge; C Palace; J K Gohagan Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2000-12
Authors: Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Eric J Jacobs; M Lyn Almon; Ann Chao; Marjorie L McCullough; Heather S Feigelson; Michael J Thun Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: L N Kolonel; B E Henderson; J H Hankin; A M Nomura; L R Wilkens; M C Pike; D O Stram; K R Monroe; M E Earle; F S Nagamine Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mia M Gaudet; Tomas Kirchhoff; Todd Green; Joseph Vijai; Joshua M Korn; Candace Guiducci; Ayellet V Segrè; Kate McGee; Lesley McGuffog; Christiana Kartsonaki; Jonathan Morrison; Sue Healey; Olga M Sinilnikova; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sylvie Mazoyer; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Hagay Sobol; Michel Longy; Marc Frenay; Frans B L Hogervorst; Matti A Rookus; J Margriet Collée; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Kees E P van Roozendaal; Marion Piedmonte; Wendy Rubinstein; Stacy Nerenstone; Linda Van Le; Stephanie V Blank; Trinidad Caldés; Miguel de la Hoya; Heli Nevanlinna; Kristiina Aittomäki; Conxi Lazaro; Ignacio Blanco; Adalgeir Arason; Oskar T Johannsson; Rosa B Barkardottir; Peter Devilee; Olofunmilayo I Olopade; Susan L Neuhausen; Xianshu Wang; Zachary S Fredericksen; Paolo Peterlongo; Siranoush Manoukian; Monica Barile; Alessandra Viel; Paolo Radice; Catherine M Phelan; Steven Narod; Gad Rennert; Flavio Lejbkowicz; Anath Flugelman; Irene L Andrulis; Gord Glendon; Hilmi Ozcelik; Amanda E Toland; Marco Montagna; Emma D'Andrea; Eitan Friedman; Yael Laitman; Ake Borg; Mary Beattie; Susan J Ramus; Susan M Domchek; Katherine L Nathanson; Tim Rebbeck; Amanda B Spurdle; Xiaoqing Chen; Helene Holland; Esther M John; John L Hopper; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Melissa C Southey; Mary Beth Terry; Nadine Tung; Thomas V Overeem Hansen; Finn C Nielsen; Mark H Greene; Mark I Greene; Phuong L Mai; Ana Osorio; Mercedes Durán; Raquel Andres; Javier Benítez; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Judy Garber; Ute Hamann; Susan Peock; Margaret Cook; Clare Oliver; Debra Frost; Radka Platte; D Gareth Evans; Fiona Lalloo; Ros Eeles; Louise Izatt; Lisa Walker; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Barwell; Andrew K Godwin; Rita K Schmutzler; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Stefanie Engert; Norbert Arnold; Dorothea Gadzicki; Michael Dean; Bert Gold; Robert J Klein; Fergus J Couch; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Douglas F Easton; Mark J Daly; Antonis C Antoniou; David M Altshuler; Kenneth Offit Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Nick Orr; Fay J Hosking; Lorna J Gibson; Kate Walker; Diana Zelenika; Ivo Gut; Simon Heath; Claire Palles; Ben Coupland; Peter Broderick; Minouk Schoemaker; Michael Jones; Jill Williamson; Sarah Chilcott-Burns; Katarzyna Tomczyk; Gemma Simpson; Kevin B Jacobs; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter; Ian P Tomlinson; Anthony Swerdlow; Alan Ashworth; Gillian Ross; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Mark Lathrop; Richard S Houlston; Julian Peto Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Amit D Joshi; Sara Lindström; Anika Hüsing; Myrto Barrdahl; Tyler J VanderWeele; Daniele Campa; Federico Canzian; Mia M Gaudet; Jonine D Figueroa; Laura Baglietto; Christine D Berg; Julie E Buring; Stephen J Chanock; María-Dolores Chirlaque; W Ryan Diver; Laure Dossus; Graham G Giles; Christopher A Haiman; Susan E Hankinson; Brian E Henderson; Robert N Hoover; David J Hunter; Claudine Isaacs; Rudolf Kaaks; Laurence N Kolonel; Vittorio Krogh; Loic Le Marchand; I-Min Lee; Eiliv Lund; Catherine A McCarty; Kim Overvad; Petra H Peeters; Elio Riboli; Fredrick Schumacher; Gianluca Severi; Daniel O Stram; Malin Sund; Michael J Thun; Ruth C Travis; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Walter C Willett; Shumin Zhang; Regina G Ziegler; Peter Kraft Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jill L Maron; Jooyeon S Hwang; Subash Pathak; Robin Ruthazer; Ruby L Russell; Gil Alterovitz Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Shelley S Tworoger; Xuehong Zhang; A Heather Eliassen; Jing Qian; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett; Bernard A Rosner; Peter Kraft; Susan E Hankinson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Merlise A Clyde; Rachel Palmieri Weber; Edwin S Iversen; Elizabeth M Poole; Jennifer A Doherty; Marc T Goodman; Roberta B Ness; Harvey A Risch; Mary Anne Rossing; Kathryn L Terry; Nicolas Wentzensen; Alice S Whittemore; Hoda Anton-Culver; Elisa V Bandera; Andrew Berchuck; Michael E Carney; Daniel W Cramer; Julie M Cunningham; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Robert P Edwards; Brooke L Fridley; Ellen L Goode; Galina Lurie; Valerie McGuire; Francesmary Modugno; Kirsten B Moysich; Sara H Olson; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Malcolm C Pike; Joseph H Rothstein; Thomas A Sellers; Weiva Sieh; Daniel Stram; Pamela J Thompson; Robert A Vierkant; Kristine G Wicklund; Anna H Wu; Argyrios Ziogas; Shelley S Tworoger; Joellen M Schildkraut Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Michael A Rosenberg; Steven A Lubitz; Honghuang Lin; Gulum Kosova; Victor M Castro; Paul Huang; Patrick T Ellinor; Roy H Perlis; Christopher Newton-Cheh Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2017-10