Literature DB >> 22972782

Detection of sheep and goat milk adulterations by direct MALDI-TOF MS analysis of milk tryptic digests.

Cosima Damiana Calvano1, Cristina De Ceglie, Antonio Monopoli, Carlo Giorgio Zambonin.   

Abstract

In dairy field, one of the most common frauds is the adulteration of higher value types of milk (sheep's and goat's) with milk of lower value (cow's milk). This illegal practice has an economic advantage for milk producers and poses a threat for consumers' health because of the presence of hidden allergens as, for example, cow milk proteins, in particular, α(s1)-casein and β-lactoglobulin. The urgent need of sensitive techniques to detect this kind of fraud brought to the development of chromatographic, immunoenzymatic, electrophoretic and mass spectrometric assays. In the current work, we present a fast, reproducible and sensitive method based on the direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS analysis of milk tryptic digests for the detection of milk adulteration by evaluating specie-specific markers in the peptide profiles. Several pure raw and commercial milk samples and binary mixtures containing cows' and goats', cows' and sheep's and goats' and sheep's milk (concentrations of each milk varied from 0% to 100%) were prepared, and tryptic digests were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. The use of the new MALDI matrix α-cyano-4-chlorocinnamic acid allowed to detect cow and goat milk peptide markers up to 5% level of adulteration. Finally, from preliminary data, it seems that the strategy could be successfully applied also to detect similar adulterations in cheese samples.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972782     DOI: 10.1002/jms.2995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1076-5174            Impact factor:   1.982


  8 in total

1.  LAMP assay for rapid diagnosis of cow DNA in goat milk and meat samples.

Authors:  R Deb; G S Sengar; U Singh; S Kumar; T V Raja; R Alex; R R Alyethodi; B Prakash
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.376

2.  A sensitive and effective proteomic approach to identify she-donkey's and goat's milk adulterations by MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting.

Authors:  Francesco Di Girolamo; Andrea Masotti; Guglielmo Salvatori; Margherita Scapaticci; Maurizio Muraca; Lorenza Putignani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Chemometric analysis combined with FTIR spectroscopy of milk and Halloumi cheese samples according to species' origin.

Authors:  Maria Tarapoulouzi; Rebecca Kokkinofta; Charis R Theocharis
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 4.  Use of Proteomics in the Study of Mastitis in Ewes.

Authors:  Angeliki I Katsafadou; Natalia G C Vasileiou; George C Fthenakis
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-08-29

5.  Synthesis and Matrix Properties of α-Cyano-5-phenyl-2,4-pentadienic Acid (CPPA) for Intact Proteins Analysis by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Antonio Monopoli; Angelo Nacci; Tommaso R I Cataldi; Cosima D Calvano
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Animal Species Authentication in Dairy Products.

Authors:  Isabel Mafra; Mónica Honrado; Joana S Amaral
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-13

7.  Rapid Discrimination and Authentication of Korean Farmstead Mozzarella Cheese through MALDI-TOF and Multivariate Statistical Analysis.

Authors:  Sujatha Kandasamy; Jayeon Yoo; Jeonghee Yun; Han-Byul Kang; Kuk-Hwan Seol; Jun-Sang Ham
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-05-21

8.  Discrimination of bovine milk from non-dairy milk by lipids fingerprinting using routine matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Philippa England; Wenhao Tang; Markus Kostrzewa; Vahid Shahrezaei; Gerald Larrouy-Maumus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.