OBJECTIVE: Longitudinal studies of dementia rely on the assumption that individuals who drop out are comparable to those who remain in the study, adjusting for measured covariates. Existing methods to handle dropouts account for differences based on past health and cognitive measures. We assess whether such adjustments fully account for differences in future dementia risk. METHODS: Among Three-City Study participants in Dijon, France, with 1 (n = 1,633) or 2 (n = 1,168) brain MRI scans, we tested whether white matter lesion volume (WMLV), hippocampal volume, or brain CSF volume predicted dropout ("unable to contact" or "refused interview") in repeated-measures logistic regression with up to 4 follow-ups (average 3.5 waves). Using linear regression, we also estimated differences in MRI volumes and MRI changes by subsequent dropout status and estimated plausible ranges for selective attrition bias based on these associations. Models were adjusted for demographic, health, and cognitive score covariates. RESULTS: Baseline greater WMLV predicted increased odds of dropping out (adjusted odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.43). Among participants with 2 MRI scans, individuals who subsequently dropped out had significantly worse declines in hippocampal volume (-0.30 SD difference; 95% CI -0.43 to -0.17) between the first and second MRI scans. CONCLUSIONS: Higher future dementia risk, indicated by worse past brain MRI findings, predicted future study dropout. Adjustment for selective attrition, based on MRI markers when available, may help reduce bias in estimates of dementia incidence and improve research on dementia risk factors. MRI findings may also help prospectively identify cohort members at elevated risk of attrition.
OBJECTIVE: Longitudinal studies of dementia rely on the assumption that individuals who drop out are comparable to those who remain in the study, adjusting for measured covariates. Existing methods to handle dropouts account for differences based on past health and cognitive measures. We assess whether such adjustments fully account for differences in future dementia risk. METHODS: Among Three-City Study participants in Dijon, France, with 1 (n = 1,633) or 2 (n = 1,168) brain MRI scans, we tested whether white matter lesion volume (WMLV), hippocampal volume, or brain CSF volume predicted dropout ("unable to contact" or "refused interview") in repeated-measures logistic regression with up to 4 follow-ups (average 3.5 waves). Using linear regression, we also estimated differences in MRI volumes and MRI changes by subsequent dropout status and estimated plausible ranges for selective attrition bias based on these associations. Models were adjusted for demographic, health, and cognitive score covariates. RESULTS: Baseline greater WMLV predicted increased odds of dropping out (adjusted odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.43). Among participants with 2 MRI scans, individuals who subsequently dropped out had significantly worse declines in hippocampal volume (-0.30 SD difference; 95% CI -0.43 to -0.17) between the first and second MRI scans. CONCLUSIONS: Higher future dementia risk, indicated by worse past brain MRI findings, predicted future study dropout. Adjustment for selective attrition, based on MRI markers when available, may help reduce bias in estimates of dementia incidence and improve research on dementia risk factors. MRI findings may also help prospectively identify cohort members at elevated risk of attrition.
Authors: C Brayne; D J Spiegelhalter; C Dufouil; L Y Chi; T R Dening; E S Paykel; D W O'Connor; A Ahmed; M A McGee; F A Huppert Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Hanne Nybo; Hans Chr Petersen; David Gaist; Bernard Jeune; Kjeld Andersen; Matt McGue; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Valory N Pavlik; Suzana Alves de Moraes; Moyses Szklo; David S Knopman; Thomas H Mosley; David J Hyman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: C R Jack; M M Shiung; J L Gunter; P C O'Brien; S D Weigand; D S Knopman; B F Boeve; R J Ivnik; G E Smith; R H Cha; E G Tangalos; R C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-02-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Qianyi Wang; Iván Mejía-Guevara; Pamela M Rist; Stefan Walter; Benjamin D Capistrant; M Maria Glymour Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Shanna L Burke; Tianyan Hu; Mitra Naseh; Nicole M Fava; Janice O'Driscoll; Daniel Alvarez; Linda B Cottler; Ranjan Duara Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Philip Benjamin; Eva Zeestraten; Christian Lambert; Irina Chis Ster; Owen A Williams; Andrew J Lawrence; Bhavini Patel; Andrew D MacKinnon; Thomas R Barrick; Hugh S Markus Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: May A Beydoun; Danielle Shaked; Sharmin Hossain; Jordan Weiss; Hind A Beydoun; Ana I Maldonado; Leslie I Katzel; Christos Davatzikos; Rao P Gullapalli; Stephen L Seliger; Guray Erus; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 5.133