Literature DB >> 10573434

Estimating the true extent of cognitive decline in the old old.

C Brayne1, D J Spiegelhalter, C Dufouil, L Y Chi, T R Dening, E S Paykel, D W O'Connor, A Ahmed, M A McGee, F A Huppert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure cognitive change using a brief measure over a period of 9 years and to adjust for attrition in the sample.
DESIGN: The Cambridge City over 75 Cohort (CC75C), a complete sample of the 75 years and older age group from five group general practices in the city of Cambridge with a systematic one-third of a further practice, all followed on four occasions.
SETTING: Cambridge city, UK, the respondents' place of residence. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2106 subjects were included at study entry. MEASUREMENTS: A brief interview, administered by a trained interviewer, containing a short cognitive scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline, 2.4 years, 6 years, and 9 years.
RESULTS: Decline in MMSE scores occurred across the population and was greater in the oldest age groups. Attrition at later stages of the follow-up was associated with greater decline at earlier stages. Adjusting the results for loss to the sample leads to considerably higher estimates of decline, with the older age groups declining faster from lower levels.
CONCLUSIONS: To date, cognitive decline in the very old has been considerably underestimated by longitudinal studies. If studies of population samples are to reflect the health and social needs of this frail group accurately, adjustments for the effect of attrition must be included before true decline can be estimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573434     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb07426.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  15 in total

1.  Proxy interviews and bias in the distribution of cognitive abilities due to non-response in longitudinal studies: a comparison of HRS and ELSA.

Authors:  David Weir; Jessica Faul; Kenneth Langa
Journal:  Longit Life Course Stud       Date:  2011-05

2.  Joint modeling of missing data due to non-participation and death in longitudinal aging studies.

Authors:  Kumar B Rajan; Sue E Leurgans
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Using telephone and informant assessments to estimate missing Modified Mini-Mental State Exam scores and rates of cognitive decline. The cardiovascular health study.

Authors:  Alice M Arnold; Anne B Newman; Norma Dermond; Mary Haan; Annette Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Combining direct and proxy assessments to reduce attrition bias in a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Theresa L Osypuk; Kellee White; Mahasin Mujahid; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  Brain MRI markers and dropout in a longitudinal study of cognitive aging: the Three-City Dijon Study.

Authors:  M Maria Glymour; Geneviève Chêne; Christophe Tzourio; Carole Dufouil
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Cognitive decline and dementia in diabetes--systematic overview of prospective observational studies.

Authors:  T Cukierman; H C Gerstein; J D Williamson
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Influence of age on practice effects in longitudinal neurocognitive change.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Assessment of the cognitive status in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shuba N
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-09-12

9.  Memory activation in healthy nonagenarians.

Authors:  Michal Schnaider Beeri; Hedok Lee; Hu Cheng; Daniel Wollman; Jeremy M Silverman; Isak Prohovnik
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 10.  What's behind the decline? The role of white matter in brain aging.

Authors:  Jason D Hinman; Carmela R Abraham
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.