Literature DB >> 22972221

Implementation of a reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for highly variable generic drug products by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Barbara M Davit1, Mei-Ling Chen, Dale P Conner, Sam H Haidar, Stephanie Kim, Christina H Lee, Robert A Lionberger, Fairouz T Makhlouf, Patrick E Nwakama, Devvrat T Patel, Donald J Schuirmann, Lawrence X Yu.   

Abstract

Highly variable (HV) drugs are defined as those for which within-subject variability (%CV) in bioequivalence (BE) measures is 30% or greater. Because of this high variability, studies designed to show whether generic HV drugs are bioequivalent to their corresponding HV reference drugs may need to enroll large numbers of subjects even when the products have no significant mean differences. To avoid unnecessary human testing, the US Food and Drug Administration's Office of Generic Drugs developed a reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach, whereby the BE acceptance limits are scaled to the variability of the reference product. For an acceptable RSABE study, an HV generic drug product must meet the scaled BE limit and a point estimate constraint. The approach has been implemented successfully. To date, the RSABE approach has supported four full approvals and one tentative approval of HV generic drug products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972221      PMCID: PMC3475857          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9406-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  22 in total

1.  Subject-by-formulation interaction in bioequivalence: conceptual and statistical issues. FDA Population/Individual Bioequivalence Working Group. Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  W W Hauck; T Hyslop; M L Chen; R Patnaik; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Impact of Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based biowaivers.

Authors:  Jack A Cook; Barbara M Davit; James E Polli
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.

Authors:  K K Midha; M J Rawson; J W Hubbard
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 4.  Evaluation of orally administered highly variable drugs and drug formulations.

Authors:  V P Shah; A Yacobi; W H Barr; L Z Benet; D Breimer; M R Dobrinska; L Endrenyi; W Fairweather; W Gillespie; M A Gonzalez; J Hooper; A Jackson; L J Lesko; K K Midha; P K Noonan; R Patnaik; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Individual bioequivalence. New concepts in the statistical assessment of bioequivalence metrics. FDA Individual Bioequivalence Working Group.

Authors:  R N Patnaik; L J Lesko; M L Chen; R L Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Power of the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence.

Authors:  K F Phillips
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1990-04

7.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

8.  BIO-international '94 Conference on Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies and Pre-Conference Satellite on 'In Vivo/In Vitro Correlation'. Munich, Germany, June 14-17, 1994.

Authors:  H H Blume; I J McGilveray; K K Midha
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

9.  Bio-International 92, conference on bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  H H Blume; K K Midha
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  High variability in drug pharmacokinetics complicates determination of bioequivalence: experience with verapamil.

Authors:  Y C Tsang; R Pop; P Gordon; J Hems; M Spino
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  26 in total

1.  Generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs: What's a clinician to do?

Authors:  Michael Privitera
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-04

2.  Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drug Products.

Authors:  Günther Hochhaus; Stephen Horhota; Leslie Hendeles; Sandra Suarez; Juliet Rebello
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Biopharmaceutical considerations and characterizations in development of colon targeted dosage forms for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Rajkumar Malayandi; Phani Krishna Kondamudi; P K Ruby; Deepika Aggarwal
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 4.  Bioequivalence for highly variable drugs: regulatory agreements, disagreements, and harmonization.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 5.  Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Aspects of Oral Modified-Release Drug Products.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Dale P Conner; Bing V Li
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Inflation of the type I error: investigations on regulatory recommendations for bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.

Authors:  Meinolf Wonnemann; Cornelia Frömke; Armin Koch
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  How Do Clinicians Adjust Lamotrigine Doses and Use Lamotrigine Blood Levels?-A Q-PULSE Survey.

Authors:  Michael Privitera; Timothy Welty; Barry Gidal; Chad Carlson; John Pollard; Michel Berg
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.500

8.  Inflation of Type I Error in the Evaluation of Scaled Average Bioequivalence, and a Method for its Control.

Authors:  Detlew Labes; Helmut Schütz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Likelihood approach for evaluating bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.

Authors:  Liping Du; Leena Choi
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.894

10.  A comparison of group sequential and fixed sample size designs for bioequivalence trials with highly variable drugs.

Authors:  Sophie I E Knahl; Benjamin Lang; Frank Fleischer; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.