Literature DB >> 20735084

Impact of Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based biowaivers.

Jack A Cook1, Barbara M Davit, James E Polli.   

Abstract

The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) is employed to waive in vivo bioequivalence testing (i.e. provide "biowaivers") for new and generic drugs that are BCS class I. Granting biowaivers under systems such as the BCS eliminates unnecessary drug exposures to healthy subjects and provides economic relief, while maintaining the high public health standard for therapeutic equivalence. International scientific consensus suggests class III drugs are also eligible for biowaivers. The objective of this study was to estimate the economic impact of class I BCS-based biowaivers, along with the economic impact of a potential expansion to BCS class III. Methods consider the distribution of drugs across the four BCS classes, numbers of in vivo bioequivalence studies performed from a five year period, and effects of highly variable drugs (HVDs). Results indicate that 26% of all drugs are class I non-HVDs, 7% are class I HVDs, 27% are class III non-HVDs, and 3% are class III HVDs. An estimated 66 to 76 million dollars can be saved each year in clinical study costs if all class I compounds were granted biowaivers. Between 21 and 24 million dollars of this savings is from HVDs. If BCS class III compounds were also granted waivers, an additional direct savings of 62 to 71 million dollars would be realized, with 9 to 10 million dollars coming from HVDs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20735084     DOI: 10.1021/mp1001747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  7 in total

1.  Statistics on BCS classification of generic drug products approved between 2000 and 2011 in the USA.

Authors:  Anil K Nair; Om Anand; Nam Chun; Dale P Conner; Mehul U Mehta; Duong T Nhu; James E Polli; Lawrence X Yu; Barbara M Davit
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Biopharmaceutic planning in pediatric drug development.

Authors:  Vivek S Purohit
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Implementation of a reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for highly variable generic drug products by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Barbara M Davit; Mei-Ling Chen; Dale P Conner; Sam H Haidar; Stephanie Kim; Christina H Lee; Robert A Lionberger; Fairouz T Makhlouf; Patrick E Nwakama; Devvrat T Patel; Donald J Schuirmann; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  The fraction dose absorbed, in humans, and high jejunal human permeability relationship.

Authors:  Arik Dahan; Hans Lennernäs; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Considerations for a Pediatric Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS): application to five drugs.

Authors:  Shivani V Gandhi; William Rodriguez; Mansoor Khan; James E Polli
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  Understanding peroral absorption: regulatory aspects and contemporary approaches to tackling solubility and permeability hurdles.

Authors:  Prachi B Shekhawat; Varsha B Pokharkar
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 7.  Evaluation of Excipient Risk in BCS Class I and III Biowaivers.

Authors:  Melissa Metry; James E Polli
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.009

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.