Literature DB >> 22971996

A multinational cohort study of in-center daily hemodialysis and patient survival.

Rita S Suri1, Robert M Lindsay, Brian A Bieber, Ronald L Pisoni, Amit X Garg, Peter C Austin, Louise M Moist, Bruce M Robinson, Brenda W Gillespie, Cecile G Couchoud, Roula Galland, Eduardo K Lacson, Deborah L Zimmerman, Yun Li, Gihad E Nesrallah.   

Abstract

Increasing hemodialysis frequency from three to six times per week improves left-ventricular mass and health-related quality of life; however, effects on survival remain uncertain. To study this, we identified 556 patients in the International Quotidian Dialysis Registry who received daily hemodialysis (more than five times per week) between 2001 and 2010. Using propensity score-based matching, we matched 318 of these patients to 575 contemporaneous patients receiving conventional (three times weekly) hemodialysis in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. All patients had session times of <5 h, and received dialysis in the clinic or hospital setting. Mortality rates between groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Mean dialysis frequency in the daily group was 5.8 sessions per week. Mean weekly treatment time was 15.7 h for daily and 11.9 h for conventional patients. During 1382 patient-years of follow-up, 170 patients died. Those receiving daily hemodialysis had a significantly higher mortality rate than those receiving conventional hemodialysis (15.6 and 10.9 deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively: hazard ratio 1.6). Similar results were found in prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Unlike previous studies, we found that in-center daily hemodialysis was not associated with any mortality benefit. Thus, decisions to undertake daily hemodialysis should be based on quality-of-life improvements, rather than on claims of improved survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971996     DOI: 10.1038/ki.2012.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  14 in total

1.  Long-Term Effects of Frequent In-Center Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Glenn M Chertow; Nathan W Levin; Gerald J Beck; John T Daugirdas; Paul W Eggers; Alan S Kliger; Brett Larive; Michael V Rocco; Tom Greene
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Intensive hemodialysis compared to conventional hemodialysis: looking at recent evidence in an old debate.

Authors:  Martin Aguilar; Laura Pilozzi-Edmonds; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Intensified hemodialysis in adults, and in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Julia Thumfart; Wolfgang Pommer; Uwe Querfeld; Dominik Müller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Dialysis: Does daily haemodialysis reduce survival?

Authors:  Alan S Kliger
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Mind the gap.

Authors:  Thomas A Golper; Rachel Fissell
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on Haemodialysis.

Authors:  Damien Ashby; Natalie Borman; James Burton; Richard Corbett; Andrew Davenport; Ken Farrington; Katey Flowers; James Fotheringham; R N Andrea Fox; Gail Franklin; Claire Gardiner; R N Martin Gerrish; Sharlene Greenwood; Daljit Hothi; Abdul Khares; Pelagia Koufaki; Jeremy Levy; Elizabeth Lindley; Jamie Macdonald; Bruno Mafrici; Andrew Mooney; James Tattersall; Kay Tyerman; Enric Villar; Martin Wilkie
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 7.  Cardiovascular impact in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: Clinical management considerations.

Authors:  Srisakul Chirakarnjanakorn; Sankar D Navaneethan; Gary S Francis; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Predictors of treatment with dialysis modalities in observational studies for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Sooraj Kuttykrishnan; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Onyebuchi A Arah; Alfred K Cheung; Steve Brunelli; Patrick J Heagerty; Ronit Katz; Miklos Z Molnar; Allen Nissenson; Vanessa Ravel; Elani Streja; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 9.  Nocturnal intermittent hemodialysis.

Authors:  Julia Thumfart; Dominik Müller
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Gihad E Nesrallah; Lihua Li; Rita S Suri
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.